Anonymous ID: 398893 Aug. 16, 2021, 11:03 a.m. No.14369057   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>14368369

Kek, rats running trying to discredit.

>โ€œSo our team said, weโ€™re not going to say that this is legitimate if we donโ€™t have confidence in the information,โ€ Merritt told The Washington Times on Thursday. He further told the outlet that the data, in the form that itโ€™s been provided, could not prove that a cyberattack had occurred.

ANONS ALREADY KNEW THIS.

The data they had were IMAGES of EMS, before and after an update.

The data not enough to prove 'hacking', but there was evidence uncovered that ISworthy of more investigation:

 

  1. There appeared to be web server logs which potentially indicate that the server was accepting and executing commands remotely.

  2. Election related data pre-upgrade was not present on the machine post-upgrade. This indicates that election related data was deleted or otherwise removed during the upgrade process.

  3. The server had a suspicious configuration script designed to remove server security, potentially opening the machine up to a network hack.