>>1434941
BO-I think THIS is definitely worthy of its own thread. Q says Bloodlines are important. The belief in the divine right of kings BS has been passed since pre-history through to today.
A contemporary theory states that King John handed the Crown of England to the Pope at the signing of the Magna Carta. So, did that belief in, "Divine Right," pass to the Pope? If so, the theory states that when our Founding fathers pleaded for Independence from the English Monarchy, in reality, they were pleading with the Pope (Divine Providence on Earth) for the privilege of self-Governance...but not the release from the Divine Right to be ruled, ultimately, by the Vatican.
If this theory is to be believed, then there now TWO separate Bloodlines attached to the USA after our, "Independence."
After the Rothschild Loan to the Holy See of 1832, and given the Rothschild obsession with Bloodlines, it can be assumed that, as repayment of the loan, at least some part of, "ownership," of the USA was transferred to the Rothschild Cartel.
So, perhaps at THIS point, three separate entities, have shared Divine Right of rulership over the USA (all the while, Americans assume complete independence and the right of self-determination).
Perhaps, now there are more than three entities or less. It's likely unknown to anyone outside the Super-Secret Circle-Jerk that happens in London as they decide the affairs of the world. But it can be assumed that the House of Saud is, or has been in the mix.
It is also known that this group of genetically degenerate families (all that inbreeding n such) attempts to end the bloodlines of the rulers of the nations they conquer. Because, just as bloodlines are of utmost importance to their skewed version of reality, so it is important that they end the bloodlines of those they conquer, ending any claim to rulership by further decendents. Modern examples of this are: the Romanovs, the Habsburgs (Archduke Ferdinand), and even the Kennedys (though Trump is righting that wrong).
Given this belief, can it be assumed that Presidents of the United States are placed in power because of bloodlines? The theory says yes. And, on the rare occasion that a non-bloodline person takes the Executive Office, plans go into the works to remove that person (lest a new bloodline begin to lay claim to the rulership). Can it be theorized that Lincoln, McKinley and Kennedy were all removed because of this policy?
We also know that these, "Elites," make efforts, on occasion to hide their Bloodlines (I guess because they are not proud of who they are). Theyprobably do this because they know that 99.99% of the population would call them what they are...to their face..., "Sociopathic," with clear mental defects.
If this belief in Bloodlines is true, and /they/ have always attempted to place their DNA in the Executive Office, what can be deduced by the election of Donald Trump? Is POTUS of the bloodline, but a non-believer? Does Hillary carry the flawed blood? Was the election supposed to be Bush v. Hillary?
It can be assumed that whether DJT is, or is not, of the bloodline, he declared that the People of the United States were no longer the subjects of Divine Right. He declared, on our behalf, our true independence from the idiotic belief that one person, because of DNA, has any right to rule another.
This theory also explains the dramatic push for people to voluntarily hand over their own DNA to companies owned by /them/. There could be many reasons they want control of the world's DNA. Maybe they will look for remnants of Bloodlines that they thought they had eliminated. Maybe they know that THEIR bloodline is flawed and they believe that the rest of actually give a flying frack about Bloodlines so they seek to hide their flaws. Perhaps they will use our DNA to determine prime matches when they need organ transplants, and because they own us, they can simply take what they need. There are many reasons that they would want to own the DNA data of the world.
99.99% of people in the modern world will likely laugh at the prospect of Divine Right to Rule other people. That being said, I think it is worthwhile, due to these whack-jobs believing they have the right to rule other people, to explore this topic in its own thread. Perhaps when we do genealogy digs on select folks, we can at least determine the root of their deluded beliefs.