Go on…
That's an awfully specific number of people.
WTAF?
Drop 104. Every time I see "pray" I think of this drop, also. Multiple meanings exist, right?
I know the "unvaccinated sperm" meme is jokingly done, but there might end up being some truth to it. If the spike proteins in every organ is true, then there will be some reduced birth rates (think ovarian issues).
I think anons need to remember that everyone that's doing something, at this point, is either exposing someone/something, or exposing themselves/associations in the process. Sometimes the fog is thick, and sometimes it's not. Keep sticking to the facts/seeking truth. That's the whole purpose of this place.
Pic re: important to remember. Just gotta do that research. There are lots of things anons can educate themselves on right here:
https://www.nih.gov/
>White hats sabotaged the vax.
White hats cranked up the timeline, and forced them to release unfinished/untested products for a reason. People have to wake up, and realize they are taking responsibility for their actions. Are they "forcing" the vax? Yes. Do you have to comply? No. There's the lesson. It's about standing up for individual rights. If Americans can't even wrap their head around that, then we don't deserve a renewed Republic.
>What they probably died from is a condition they already had.
Just like COVID, right? 99.5% survivability for a majority of the public, and they push it anyway? We never did that for the flu and it kills more children than COVID. Think, anon: "Why?" Ask questions.
>Anyone saying that the White Hats changed the shots, aren't paying attention to the adverse effects.
Just to be clear:
-
I never said WH changed the vax. As a matter of fact, I've stated very much the opposite.
-
There are "safe" vaccines, but again, you have to do your research. This anon hasn't had one since 12 y/o minus tetanus; which is a relatively safe vaccine in comparison to others.
NIH accepts submissions from all over the globe. Many doctors have been trying to get the truth out. You have to do your research. Remember this guy? France's health authorities shut him down as he was seeing massive success with HCQ. Why's that? And here's at article he submitted to NIH for dissemination to other doctors.
Again, just because it says "NIH" doesn't mean comp'd. Look into the research, and source the doctors themselves.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33500211/
I'm not saying there aren't other sources to look in to. What I am saying is that if you want to gain any traction in public debate, you aren't going to get very far with "thesevaccinesareofthedevil.net" and other "Mercola" looking websites that people have a tendency to lump in with the AJs of this world. NIH.gov and other resources give some backbone with doctors putting their name out there with claims they often will stand behind. For that matter, https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/ is a great resource. Take their claims, and use peer-reviewed/sourced articles from NIH to back them.
Same for your sites you like to read/trust. Use your site's claims to search actual peer-reviewed studies on NIH.gov. That way you have a convincing, well-researched, and sometimes peer-reviewed studies to back the claims. It's more "authentic" looking and persuasive when talking to your doctor, too.
Just trying to help educate anons. It's our bodies, and our rights. Make a persuasive argument. If you doctor doesn't like it, get a new doctor. If people are still unwilling to listen to your arguments, dust your feet and move on.
5:5
I mean vaccines other than COVID ones, yes. In regards to the COVID vaccines; Agreed. Not sure what all is in them, and neither is anyone else. They are definitely doing a test on people with them to see what happens. I know some people that have taken the vaccine and been just fine; no issues whatsoever. I also know a few others that are "coming down with COVID (sometimes, again)".