>>1438937
The case # on that document (pic related) is for the case Weiner is already in jail for.
https://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?s=NY&d=106623
Not likely same case # would be used for new indictment.
>>1438937
The case # on that document (pic related) is for the case Weiner is already in jail for.
https://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?s=NY&d=106623
Not likely same case # would be used for new indictment.
Now we need to see the ACTUAL Search & Seizure Warrant and attachment A mag. 6123. That'll tell us what was was taken as evidence.
This Warrant was already used for the case he's in jail for now. But if this warrant was sealed, then no-one had legal access to it nor any of the items seized and used in the trial.
Now that it's unsealed, the evidence can be examined by others?
Used in other cases?
Where are the law fags when you need them.
Can you answer these: >>1439283
This Warrant was already used for the case he's in jail for now. But if this warrant was sealed, then no-one had legal access to it nor any of the items seized and used in the trial.
Now that it's unsealed, the evidence can be examined by others?
Used in other cases?
Skull & Bones