Anonymous ID: 9c2024 Aug. 18, 2021, 10:17 p.m. No.14394795   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Ben vs Entire NASA Climate Team

 

1) They focused on Laschamp, cosmic rays and climate change. I did not. I corrected their focus on Laschamp (well, apparently not), focused on SOLAR forcing, and climate change was only half of the story.

 

2) They cherrypicked articles that did not reflect a total treatment of the field- old articles that do not at all represent the current state of the science. The current state is what I showed, with more papers, newer papers, and the inclusion of broader perspectives on cosmic ray atmospheric electrification, the solar part in climate forcing, and the biosphere risk of a magnetic excursion.

 

3) NASA ignored numerous critical aspects of my initial response video/letter. The parts they addressed were insufficient, old, often incorrect, confusing, and indicative of their failure to grasp the simple theme of an argument.

 

Note: Their letter is being copied/pasted to everyone who mentions our initial response to them. They did NOT send a copy to me.

 

Ben 1

NASA 0โ€ฆagain

kek