Yeah, I can see that.
But, others have used AJ's platform (like Trump) in the past for additional exposure to a decent sized audience.
Stew, like everyone else (cough Lindell), needs to be judged by their ability to bring forth verifiable sauce.
History can be a guide that when the women get pissed it's often the tipping point for revolutionary actions.
Look at the French Revolution.
When the women had trouble obtaining bread (cheaply) they said Enough! en masse and that was the end of the monarchy at that point.
>Trust what you see and not what people tell you to see.
WTF do you think Anons are doing?
You (and others) are the ones that get big mad when Anons make choices that differ from yours.
I agree with OP - that's glowie af behavior.
>we don't fucking care
LIAR.
You and others won't shut the fuck up when Anons make personal decisions.
You are way over-invested in this issue on a personal level.
Quite frankly, you glow.
I agree that vax mandates should be fought against.
I haven't taken them nor do I plan to.
But, to berate Anons that have or say they will is bullshit.
Especially after someone as trusted as Trump is just admitted he's proud of his efforts and even took a vax (prolly J&J) himself.
For the longest time Anons have debated Trump's true feeling about the vaxxes because he's been discreet about his on personal use of them.
Last night in a yuge development he said he took the vax.
Of course that's going to be discussed here.
> If some vaccines are SAFE
Which Q's [NOT ALL] attests to - and that carries moar weight with me than Anonymous Big Mad posters here.
> No vaxx = no food
Only being done is select blue cities so far and not in every establishment food can be obtained.
And even that has faced huge backlash.
I say let them install it full bore at this point.
That means The Precipice gets here asap which is a good thing.
That said, they won't do it because bullies never fight.
So, who are the emotional tampons on the board right now.
Anons that say what Trump said last night is 'dasting and provides new data points to a confusing issue?
Anons that freak out seeing any discussion (not even promotion) of said points that stray 1mm away from being total hardcore anti-vaxx?
Concur - hardcore unvaxxed restrictions are doomed to massive failure and get the Precipice for the Restofus here tomorrow instead of 2 weeks.
Not my point.
My point is they instituted the "no vax/no food" in the most pro-vax small areas and the blowback from just that was strong.
They're fucked bigly if they even try to expand it just a little bit moar much less everywhere.
The fight against it (which I assume you're waging, too) is working so keep it up, Anon.
You 2 are most likely shills or at best paranoid Anons.
Go find 1 post where someone says EVERYBODY needs to take the J&J Vax.
And, no, discussing it because Trump just made a big admission doesn't count.
Yep, you're a shill.
You're the one that hates Trump and thus Q as well.
Not even sure why you're here unless you're being paid to shill.
>I also checked his Rep acct and personal account
If you had only read the timestamp line you wouldn't have needed to bother.
I think that Anon does good work exposing sloppy Anons.
>allowed to make our own choices
astute
Forcing the vaxx on others.
Getting big mad at others that take it (or even discuss it hypothetically).
The same cancer as far as I'm concerned.
I think Notables collected AFTER a bread hits 751 are the best Notables.
Reason: It gives all Anons a chance to review/counter info being presented.
Things often get Noted only to turn out to get disproven before the bread ends.
>you left out peacefully which was most important part
That sounds too safe spacey to me, Anon.