Anonymous ID: 7a1cd3 Aug. 20, 2021, 9:39 p.m. No.14413054   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3058 >>3060 >>3064 >>3071 >>3079

>>14412726

Nah, son. Consciousness and sentience are quantum, and advanced sentience leads to sapience. Why do you think the general consensus among anons is that quantum computing will lead to true AI.

 

Anyhow, here's Dr Stuart Hameroff MD and Sir Dr Reverend Roger Danger Penrose PHD ESQ RKOouttanowhere on the quantum nature of consciousness and the how neuronal microtubules act as a qubit matrix allowing continuous superposition collapse, which, I guess, equates to the universe observing itself.

Penrose starts (if I remember correctly), and his talk lies on the outer edge of theoretical physics (read his Cycles of Time for a mindfuck), and Hameroff finishes with the meat and potatoes of the matter.

Anonymous ID: 7a1cd3 Aug. 20, 2021, 9:54 p.m. No.14413135   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3145 >>3160

>>14413088

I recently had a better look at many worlds, and I no longer hate it. I just needed to look at it as all of the intertwining wavefunctions of the universe, that is, truly EVERY possibility of every matter and energy interaction existing simultaneously, just out of phase, so no sci-fi interactions like travel or communication are possible

 

I still prefer copenhagen, but I don't think it's complete. Physics in general isn't complete so long as GR and QM don't play perfectly. AND

 

that's exactly what Penrose gets at. Quantum interactions in a curved spacetime provide moments of "proto-consciousness."

 

Honestly though, since the stolen election I haven't really thought about any of this, we're well and truly fucked

Anonymous ID: 7a1cd3 Aug. 20, 2021, 10:17 p.m. No.14413273   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14413079

>(You)

Well, the universe must be conscious, as it gives rise to consciousness. Also, if Penrose is right about proto-consciousness, then even absent the presence of life the universe still IS