Anonymous ID: 5f46a2 Aug. 21, 2021, 1:49 a.m. No.14413896   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>14413885

>if there's company policy (like vaccination, wearing a tie) and the employee declines to follow it, he or she can be fired and wont be eligible to receive unemployment benefits.

 

we're not talking about ties, here. if there were a company policy that you had to rape your own children, they could fire you?

there are limits to "company policy" and coercion to take an experimental vaccine fall outside their purview.

Anonymous ID: 5f46a2 Aug. 21, 2021, 1:52 a.m. No.14413908   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>14413847

 

they're bluffing and they know it. call them on it. NO ONE can force you to comply with a vaccination by using economic duress.

i KNOW it's going to be inconvenient and even difficult, but in the end, you WILL prevail, and you just might hit the litigation lottery.

Anonymous ID: 5f46a2 Aug. 21, 2021, 2 a.m. No.14413935   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3948

>>14413923

>I dont even know where to begin…

and yet you did

>First, why should it matter if I am driving or they are driving…

their trucks burn much more gas than your car

>Second, they can deliver more than one order on a trip…

you can stop at more than one store, too

>Third, can you think of a better way to make the middle east irrelevant again???

that's so fucking retarded, no response is possible.