Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 2:32 a.m. No.1441727   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1734 >>1760 >>1769 >>1791 >>1799 >>1817 >>1860 >>1999 >>2109

I was just thinking. Iran threatened to out the corrupt politicians that took bribes to make the 'deal' happen. You know, the 'deal' that was never even signed by our government. You know, the one that involved tons(literally) of untraceable cash! You know, the 'deal' that Hussein never even bothered putting before congress(how these deal as normally go down). Maybe JK went over there assuring them that the POTUS would stay 'in', when he didnt, that's when they sent out that threatening tweet.

 

I definitely have a feeling there's more here. A lot more than I'm/We're aware. Have any anons dug in on this? I'm thinking our POTUS is playing this like a fiddle. I'd definitely be a huge redpoll to normie's if the fact a lot of our politicians financially gained from this 'deal'!

 

NOTEABLE?

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 2:40 a.m. No.1441746   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1749 >>1752

>>1441734

I agree anon, I was thinking the same. Was looking through the notables, but didn't really see anything. It is late/very early morning. It could just be a lack of sleep on my part, but definitely think it's of importance if it hasn't been dug.

 

If it wasn't part of the plan, it'd be kek as F. Thinking it has to be though since it seems to be playing out so perfectly. Again, would be a YUGE redpoll for normies, but also think it'd be an easier one for them to swallow.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 2:48 a.m. No.1441760   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1769

>>1441727

>I was just thinking. Iran threatened to out the corrupt politicians that took bribes to make the 'deal' happen. You know, the 'deal' that was never even signed by our government. You know, the one that involved tons(literally) of untraceable cash! You know, the 'deal' that Hussein never even bothered putting before congress(how these deal as normally go down). Maybe JK went over there assuring them that the POTUS would stay 'in', when he didnt, that's when they sent out that threatening tweet.

>I definitely have a feeling there's more here. A lot more than I'm/We're aware. Have any anons dug in on this? I'm thinking our POTUS is playing this like a fiddle. I'd definitely be a huge redpoll to normie's if the fact a lot of our politicians financially gained from this 'deal'!

>NOTEABLE?

>

 

>>1441752

Not sure if it's already been mentioned? Looked through a lot of breads notables, but haven't really seen any talk of what I just said. If it hasn't been said in notables, I'm thinking its definitely noteworthy. Again though, I could be missing it, eye lids are getting heavy. Have been doing a lot of lurking tonight trying to catch up on the last few days of Q's drops. By the looks of most the recent drops, it looks like the 🔨 is going to be dropping very soon! Definitely a great timeline!

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 2:56 a.m. No.1441775   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1441749

I'd be stoked if Iran actually made that a reality! I'm thinking there may be more to dig on all this. We've learned, since it's been back in the news, the deal was never signed. It wasn't a 'real deal' to begin with. Leaned that it was actually more 'physical' cash than we were lead to believe. No one actually knows what all was included in the 'deal'.

 

The POTUS keeps pointing to the fact he was able to get hostages released from NK, WITHOUT, giving billions of 💲. That fact has definitely been pushed. He also didn't have to trade high-level terrorists(enemies of the state, though, I'm not sure that we have any NK's captive).

 

All that said, I just have a feeling there's probably a good bit more that we're missing?

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 2:59 a.m. No.1441783   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1791

>>1441769

Maybe "Dig MOAR on NK?", honestly not sure? Maybe another anon can help out with the notable name, if that one is 💩, which thee more I'm thinking about it? Maybe it is? Don't want it to get passed by due to a bad bullet point. Especially if it could lead to some significant digging.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 3:16 a.m. No.1441822   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1828

>>1441813

Maybe BO or BV thinks that is a form of doxxing? Seems like that'd be a reeeaal stretch, but is my guess? Maybe/Hopefully another anon will have an actual answer for you.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 3:28 a.m. No.1441857   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1441828

 

Are you using a VPN? I definitely understand the uses for VPNS, and MOST of the time, their a GREAT tool. That said, I think VPN use here is a tool for shills/'them'. So they can keep switching IPs when banned, makes banning pretty tough. IMO, anyway. I'm definitely thinking the BO and BV do a pretty good job in most circumstances when it comes to bans, but I'm honestly not sure about your instance. Sorry anon wish I could've been of more help.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 3:42 a.m. No.1441901   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1914 >>1990 >>2012 >>2020

Can any of you anons save me a bit of time(not having to sort through the notables).

 

Was watching hannity last night, and he was talking about the mole(or possible moles) that we're placed by the f_I into the POTUS campaign. Hannity kept saying he was pretty positive he knew who it was, and kept mentioning initials. He never said what he thought the damn initials were though.

 

Has an anon/s fingered the mole/s? Thanks again in advance for the time saving, just trying to catch back up before I try and actually try to get a few hours shut eye.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 3:57 a.m. No.1441940   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1964 >>1969 >>2213

>>1441914

I agree with all that you just listed, they've probably all 'informed'(or Mueller is trying to get them to make shit up rather). What I'm talking about, there is ATLEAST ONE specific mole that congress is 'trying' to learn the identity of. An actual plant of the FBI, I believe BEFORE(?), the actual investigation officially started. Again, it could have been one of the people you listed, but the way you stated it, didn't seem certain? Sorry if it was. They(hannity and the panel, I believe it was Sarah carter, Desantis, and Jordan) speculated it could have been more than just one mole, but there was definitely atleast one. Which would be a YUGE revelation if the FBI placed a mole BEFORE the official investigation start. Thanks again in advance for the info.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 4:04 a.m. No.1441964   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1976 >>2086

>>1441940

As I said in the previous post, Hannity, kept talking about initials. Saying he was almost positive he knew the initials. Then Sarah carter would agree that he probably knew the persons initials. It was pissing me off because they mentioned it a couple times. They could have mentioned at least the initials, followed by saying it was just speculation at this point. Supposedly, Sarah Carter is supposed to be writing an article today saying who. Was thinking maybe a coup!e of you anons maybe already knew, was thinking it was probably already in the notables, but was just trying to save a little more time before trying to catch a few hours of shut eye. Trying to catch up after a couple day break, and it's been busy around here. It's bugging me now, lol, hopefully one of you anons can help me out. Thanks again in advance.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 4:14 a.m. No.1441990   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1441976

'What's the point', in finding out who the FBI used as a MOLE?? Maybe that post didn't make sense without my original post >>1441901 , both the identity of the MOLE and the fact that the F_I planted them BEFORE the official start of the investigation are YUUUGE.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 4:37 a.m. No.1442084   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1442012

I honestly have no clue if by what he said, he was referring to his own initials, or if he just meant that the person has been spoken of many times on the show…. It was a frustrating segment for sure! Kept hinting at knowing who, and mentioned the he(they, the panel), knew the persons initials. He made it seem like he was going to say the initials until the end of the segment when he said Sarah Carter would have an article hopefully coming out today talking about it. I figured it would have already been figured out here. That's why I was asking. Damn, it's going to really bug me until I find out kek. Guess I'll have to wait till her article drops. The FACT(which is now proven) that there was a mole, put in place by the F_I, before the official start of the 'investigation' is seriously YUUUGE. I think once the identity drops, its going to make some waves. We, and most repubs, know the witch hunt is a sham. The fact that they planted a mole before the investigation shows Comey, McCabe, Stoczyk, ect conspired against a political candidate. Which should lead to charges sooooon. Once you prove that conspiracy(again we know, for the Normie's), it'll be pretty easy to show they let Killary off the hook in her investigation(for the Normie's). Once you prove the Killary conspiracy that leads to Obummer, Lynch, ect. Long story short, I think once that name drops, the snowball that's rolling now, will become a D5 avalanche. Hope all that made sense, eye lids are definitely getting heavy now. Hoping someone can come up with initials/name before I take off.

Anonymous ID: ab44b7 May 17, 2018, 5:17 a.m. No.1442255   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1442012

 

Think I figured out the possible mole/s that the F_I planted in the POTUS campaign.

 

It was Joseph Mifsud as well as possibly Stephan Halper. Think this is going to be a bombshell when verified.