Anonymous ID: d5e51f Aug. 21, 2021, 4:22 a.m. No.14414350   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4368

>>14414340

It's different when you're employed by the government, fren. Due process doesn't just cover criminal activity, but any deprivation of "life, liberty, or property." This case would be a property interest based on the mutually understood contract between the police officer/union and the government, which required both notice and some sort of ability to respond BEFORE the deprivation of property (aka taking away pay.)

Many Supreme Court cases have fleshed this out over the last few decades.

Anonymous ID: d5e51f Aug. 21, 2021, 4:31 a.m. No.14414388   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4534

>>14414368

It's only convoluted and illogical to you because you don't know what I'm talking about, not because it's actually convoluted or illogical. That was a succinct description of the Constitutional case that can and should be made in their favor.

 

I'm trying to tell you you have more rights than you know, but particularly if the government is acting against you.

 

I'm in law school to help, and you should be glad there are anons in this profession. Not every average person is going to have the time and energy to learn these things, and sitting back and complaining about our legal system is far too easy, but sadly isn't helping anyone.

Anonymous ID: d5e51f Aug. 21, 2021, 5:31 a.m. No.14414626   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4635 >>4765

>>14414612

You're putting words in my mouth. I never said you had to go to law school to know the law, just that this anon does not know the law, despite his feeble responses.

But seriously, I learn more in one week in law school than most will know in their entire lives, including how to counsel and represent those who cannot represent themselves fruitfully in a court. That does not make me "above" others. It is simply a very specialized discipline. It is you who does not understand this.

You're showing your ignorance through your statements.

Anonymous ID: d5e51f Aug. 21, 2021, 5:40 a.m. No.14414680   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4683 >>4686

>>14414655

You don't even realize how presumptive your statements have been, yet call me presumptive.

You can think I'm stupid all day but it does not change the facts. I'm getting specialized training to help regular people in a specific way.

Do you think Durham is stupid for being a lawyer? How about Sidney Powell?

Lawyers have a big role to play in this movement, racket or no racket.

The fact that I'm even responding to you shows that I care enough to help you. I have not insulted you. You reverted to insults immediately, which proves already that your argument is the weaker one.