dChan
Anonymous ID: 2b78bf May 17, 2018, 6:25 a.m. No.1442615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2650 >>2737

TRYING TO SETUP POTUS FOR PAY FOR PLAY

 

Searching for PAY FOR PLAY payments that went missing from a the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN)

 

Journalist Ronin Farrow is back with another bombshell report - this time from the person who leaked Michael Cohen's banking records, detailing "pay for play" type payments from the likes of Novartis and AT&T.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-17/cohen-leaker-steps-forward-say-i-am-terrified-right-now-would-be-understatement

Anonymous ID: 2b78bf May 17, 2018, 6:36 a.m. No.1442697   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2712 >>2758 >>2888

  1. So a few important points on that new NYT "Hurricane Crossfire" piece. A story that, BTW, all of us following this knew had to be coming. This is DOJ/FBI leakers' attempt to get in front of the facts Nunes is forcing out, to make it not sound so bad. Don't buy it. It's bad.

 

  1. Biggest takeaway: Govt "sources" admit that, indeed, the Obama DOJ and FBI spied on the Trump campaign. Spied. (Tho NYT kindly calls spy an "informant.") NYT slips in confirmation far down in story, and makes it out like it isn't a big deal. It is a very big deal.

 

  1. In self-serving desire to get a sympathetic story about its actions, DOJ/FBI leakers are willing to provide yet more details about that "top secret" source (namely, that spying was aimed at Page/Papadopoulos)–making all more likely/certain source will be outed. That's on them

 

  1. DOJ/FBI (and its leakers) have shredded what little credibility they have in claiming they cannot comply with subpoena. They are willing to provide details to friendly media, but not Congress? Willing to risk very source they claim to need to protect?

 

  1. Back in Dec., NYT assured us it was the Papadopoulos-Downer convo that inspired FBI to launch official counterintelligence operation on July 31, 2016. Which was convenient, since it diminished the role of the dossier. However . . .

 

  1. Now NYT tells us FBI didn't debrief downer until August 2nd. And Nunes says no "official intelligence" from allies was delivered to FBI about that convo prior to July 31. So how did FBI get Downer details? (Political actors?) And what really did inspire the CI investigation?

 

  1. As for whether to believe line that FBI operated soberly/carefully/judiciously in 2016, a main source for this judgment is, um . . .uh . . . Sally Yates. Who was in middle of it all. A bit like asking Putin to reassure that Russia didn't meddle in our election.

 

  1. On that, if u r wondering who narrated this story, note paragraphs that assure everybody that hardly anybody in DOJ knew about probe. Oh, and Comey also was given few details. Nobody knew nothin'! (Cuz when u require whole story saying u behaved, it means u know you didn't.)

 

https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/996917898898649088

Anonymous ID: 2b78bf May 17, 2018, 7:06 a.m. No.1442876   🗄️.is 🔗kun

THE MEDIA IS GOING WILD

Is North Korea trying to get John Bolton fired?

 

Trump accuses Obama of embedding spy in his campaign while citing no evidence, in misspelled early morning tweet

 

Trump faces backlash after calling some undocumented immigrants 'animals'

 

MICHAEL AVENATTI SAYS OTHER WOMEN CLAIMING TO HAVE HAD AFFAIRS WITH TRUMP AND SIGNED NDAS WILL SOON BE REVEALED