Anonymous ID: 3038e6 Aug. 22, 2021, 4:07 p.m. No.14430086   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14430045

 

Am I interpreting your response correctly when I extrapolate that

-you have applied that ability

-you have recognized yourself applying that ability

-In retrospect, you have concluded that, in any of those instances, your moral reasoning for applying that ability was, from your perspective, justified in some instances and wrongful in others

 

?

If you meant to convey differing information, please correct me.

Anonymous ID: 3038e6 Aug. 22, 2021, 4:10 p.m. No.14430114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0149 >>0269

>>14430062

Thank you for the honest insight into your process of existing, Anon.

Feel free to share more viewpoints of yours around that topic.

 

>Certain things are allowed if they is a potential for us to benefit from it

'Allowed' in what conetext?

 

Are you alluding to something akin to universal moral natural law?

Anonymous ID: 3038e6 Aug. 22, 2021, 4:43 p.m. No.14430505   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14430458

 

That resonates with me.

I cared neither for nor about Donald Trump running up to the 2016 election.

The thing that made me weirdly passionate about defending him is the perplexed realization of how fervently the media lies about who he is and what he does.

 

He has plenty of legitimate Character flaws that would be prime fodder for news media, and they still felt the need to fabricate things about him out of thin air.

 

This really activated my almonds.