>https://bigleaguepolitics.com/feds-charge-infowars-reporter-owen-shroyer-for-reporting-from-capitol-steps-during-jan-6-protest
Charged for what?
I've read no-where what the charges are. Just fear-shilling against protesters.
>https://bigleaguepolitics.com/feds-charge-infowars-reporter-owen-shroyer-for-reporting-from-capitol-steps-during-jan-6-protest
Charged for what?
I've read no-where what the charges are. Just fear-shilling against protesters.
They're still going to cheat. We have to hit them with an overwhelming number of ballots.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_mosque_shootings
Bbbbut Larry said we have free and fair elections. Biden is out duly elected President.
Larry said!
This one is beautiful.
Shows the setup.
>You have to know the truth to tell the truth.
Seeing a video or reading a post isn't enough.
>And letโs just stop a minute for the videographer here.
>How traumatic is that????
Not very. They're probably union scale. The longer it takes, the more they're paid.
At this point, direct experience. First hand accounts from known trusted sources (family, extended family).
Anon will do what anon does.
For this anon:
If you are registered to vote and you don't vote, then your "vote" can be used by someone else. That's why there is a pause in counting the votes. They have to determine who didn't vote so they can use that person's registration to "vote" for the (usually) dem candidate.
This is why the Board of Elections don't want people canvassing voters after elections to see if those people actually did vote - because it will prove fraud if the voter claimed he didn't vote but the records show that a vote was recorded for him.
>That seems to be a very sensible approach.
Yes, but very limiting.
My secondary source of truth is an voracious consumption of alternative news, applying a reality percentage based on the history of the source, sifting through the many varying accounts culminating in a hazy reality.
Whose truth?
Look at the AZ audits. And counts in other states. The cheaters screwed up and pumped more ballots than registered voters into the system. That is proof of fraud.
If you don't vote, they'll take your vote without consequence. Enough people don't vote, and they can take a winning number of votes without raising alarm.
>THEY ALREADY DID, DO YOU NOT GET THAT?
And it is being discovered and reported and more and more normies are waking up to the fact that it is rigged.
If you give up now, it'll slide back into the acceptable range and "oh look, California is blue again. No surprise."
Or just give up. That'll surely work.