Very pretty, but if you take out the anonymous post and the random text, the connections disappear. Nonsense.
Who is this Anonymous person whose posts are linked in that graphic? Looks like garbage to moi.
We normally leave such folk out of proofs, because there is no evidence that "helper anons" exist and no way to reliably identify them if they do.
I didn't say it didn't matter. Just that it should not be included in proofs/graphics because it will only confuse newbies, and again you're never sure about "helper anons." Q replies to "ordinary anons" all the time, and we don't include their posts in proofs. Think!