VAX IS STILL NOT APPROVED
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/335737138
>THE INJECTION STILL ISNT APPROVED BY FDA
I REPEAT
>IT'S STILL NOT APPROVED BY FDA
DONT BELIEVE THE PFIZER SHILLS, THEY'RE TRYING TO MANUFACTURE CONSENT
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
THE VAX IS NOT FULLY APPROVED
IT IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF THE EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION, NOT A FULL APPROVAL. READ THE FDA'S STATEMENT.
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/335736300
this vaxx will never be approved because big pharma will never allow themselves to get btfo by lawsuits
sauce it in a document
show us the documentation where it says this is eua for 12-15, and fully approved for 16 and older. Not some bullshit media crap either. Do you really think big pharma is going to subject itself to lawsuits?
pharma shills are shilling this morning, no where does it say full approval for anyone of any age
if they approve it like you said, then they become subject to lawsuits. Doubt they would plan their own funeral, but hey who knows.
yup, they extended the EUA and have approved the EUA to be used in children 12 and older which is sick
approving an application is a full out approval?
I still do not see where it says its approved. I see where it says it's not approved. I saw an approval for an application. I am not a bio lawfag so I really can't say. But the picrel seems to be pretty clear.
still not buying it, approval for application would mean they have been approved to apply for it and would contradict picrel
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/335736300#p335743434
this makes sense
this is what it looks like… The EULA has been extended to all vaxxes, which makes no sense because pfizer has had their BLA approved.
yes it has been approved, but ALL vaxxes still fall under the EUA… which is fucked. All the profit none of the liability
holy shitnotable
i see your cap and it's notable, but the document is saying that the pfizer vaxx has been approved, yet falls under the EUA so they don't get ass raped by lawyers.
Your screencap implies very much that it has not been approved. Nice catch
did you see the screen cap? why would the printed material on the vaxx need to say not approved or licensed by the fda.
You don't have genuinely have approval for a product when you print "not approved or licensed by the fda" on it.
that just means that pfizer now has protection from the EUA even though their product is approved… the way this is going it looks like this is just a technicality to be able to say the product is approved while they cover their ass against all lawsuits