Anonymous ID: e8eeb6 Aug. 23, 2021, 6:07 p.m. No.14440960   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1015 >>1052 >>1126 >>1235 >>1323

>>14440670

Counterpoint to Necrophilia being acceptable by Islamists

 

"Necrophilia in Islam :

The simplest way to disprove this allegation is to go to Islamic Jurisprudence.

 

https://islamgreatreligion.wordpress.com/tag/necrophilia-law/

 

As the charge is that of necrophilia (sex with a dead body) we can look into Islamic theology. If the allegation is true then the act of necrophilia would be allowed in Islam. So what does the expert (Ibn Hajar Haytami) say?

 

Well, he includes necrophilia in his list of sins [1]. Thus we can realise necrophilia is not allowed in Islam and the Prophet did not engage in such a deed.

 

In fact if we consult Fiqh we realise “it is unlawful to look at the nakedness of the deceased or touch it” [2].Thus further showing sex with the deceased (dead) cannot possibly be allowed. This further shows the Prophet did not engage in such a deed as if he did then the practice of necrophilia would have been allowed in Islam.

 

Now We Know that claims of necrophilia against prophet muhammad is lie.We will now see the claim created by Zakria Bothros and the narration and hadith he used to make this false claim. This will also show people the filthy and dirty mind of christians leaders."

 

"Zakaria Bothros says this: This is from a book called “Kanz Al Umal” (The Treasure of the Workers), in the chapter of “The issues of women”, authored by Ali Ibn Husam Aldin, commonly known as Al-Mutaki Al-Hindi. He based his book on the hadiths and sayings listed in “Al-Jami Al-Saghir,” written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.

 

Narrated by Ibn Abbas:

 

‘I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I SLEPT with her in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib’… The prophet was referring to Fatima , the mother of Ali.

 

“The Arabic word used here for slept is “Id’tajat,” and literally means “lay down” with her. It is often used to mean, “Lay down to have sex.” Muhammad is understood as saying that because he slept with her she has become like a wife to him so she will be considered like a “mother of the believers.” This will supposedly prevent her from being tormented in the grave, since Muslims believe that as people wait for the Judgment Day they will be tormented in the grave. “Reduce the pressure” here means that the torment won’t be as much because she is now a “mother of the believers” after Muhammad slept with her and “consummated” the union. “

Anonymous ID: e8eeb6 Aug. 23, 2021, 6:14 p.m. No.14441015   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1031 >>1126 >>1235 >>1323

>>14440960

More on the Islamist Retort to Necrophilia being Acceptable

 

The Context and Explanation

Firstly the translation of “I slept” does not best convey the meaning based on the context, the Arabic word translated as “I Slept” is Idtaja’ ( ). This word can either mean:

lie down, lie, recline, repose [3].

 

you can check by your self… click below to see meaning in Google translation…

 

Show meaning

 

I hope you have noticed within the list of definitions (lie down, lie, recline, repose) the word “sleep” (or “sex”) does not appear.

 

so,You can see your self how Zakariya Lied about this meaning.

 

So What Context says ????

 

did Muhammad sleep or lie in the grave?

The context explains it all, as it was a grave we realize the word cannot possibly mean “sleep” but rather it means “lie/lay in the grave”.

 

This actually makes sense with the other bits of context we have at our disposal; “When the grave was prepared Muhammad himself examined it and placed her into the grave” [5].

 

Thus, it is reasonable to think the examination procedure also involved Muhammad lying in the grave. This would not have been at length in terms of duration (time). Therefore we realize Muhammad simply laid in the grave to make sure it was comfortable for his deceased foster mother as well as to honor the lady as it would be seen as a fabulous honor to be resting in a place where a Prophet of God had previously laid.

 

Did Muhammad Lie with his Foster Mother (Fatima Bint Asad) in the Grave?

It does not appear so as the process of investigating/examining the grave would have been PRIOR (before) lowering Fatima Bint Asad into the grave. Therefore Muhammad would have reclined (lied) in the grave in order to check the grave before Fatima was placed in the grave, thus he would not have lied with her. Furthermore, there were two types of graves in vogue at the time of the Prophet which were Lahd and Shaqq (shiq) .

 

The Shaqq type of grave is characterized by a niche within the grave for the dead body to be placed within. So it is impossible to lie with the body due to the niche. [8]

 

The Lahd form of grave is characterized by a lateral hollow which is dug into the side of the base of the grave for the body to be placed [8]. This type of grave makes lying with the deceased body risky as the earth could cave in on top of the body and the one who is lying with the deceased.

 

Thus, it seems the laying in the grave for examination purposes was done prior to Fatima being lowered into her resting place. This is despite the Arabic phraseology used literally denoting “with”:

 

 

However, even if one takes it literally it does not mean wrong doing took place and it certainly does not refer to sex.

 

If Muhammad did lie with his foster mother whilst she was in the grave in order to check for comfort and honor her before the companions filled the grave it would only have been for a short time and this would have been witnessed by other people too. There is nothing wrong with lying in the grave to ensure comfort for your foster mother and honor; in fact it was an act of great compassion.

 

Do we believe them or do we not?

Anonymous ID: e8eeb6 Aug. 23, 2021, 6:35 p.m. No.14441213   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1223 >>1235 >>1323

A little more about Necrophilia in Islam from a scholar

 

I see both sides of this argument as it appears many Islamists have been arrested for Necrophilia…

 

That may have been true then, but not now. In late 2017, necrophilia was again mentioned and legitimized, and this time by Sheikh Sabri Abdul Raeuf – a professor at Egypt's Al Azhar, the Islamic world's most prestigious madrassa.

 

During a televised show in Egypt, the Sheikh-professor was asked if it is permissible for a husband to penetrate his wife after death. He replied: "It is not favorable in Islam; however the Islamic law considers it as Halal," meaning "permissible," not a sin or crime.

 

A Youm7 Arabic report titled (translation) "The Books of Al-Shafi'i, Al-Hanbali, and Al-Hanafi Reveal That Sex With a Corpse Is Not Adultery" verified the professor's claim.

 

Here, I would be remiss not to point out that this excursus on Islam's position concerning necrophilia should not be interpreted as meaning necrophilia is a normal or widespread activity among Muslim societies. Indeed, whenever it makes the news in the Arab world, most Muslims as can be expected of most decent people of whichever creed respond with incredulity, and revulsion.

 

Rather, the point here is that Islamic jurisprudence is so legalistically slavish to old, sometimes bizarre, texts and is often ambiguously worded as to legitimize much that is offensive to modern sensibilities. And not only does this provide a moral sometimes even pious cover for deviants; it can attract them.

 

Just as pedophiles, rapists, sex-slavers, misogynists, psychotic mass murderers, extortionists, and those eager to be "breastfed" by women or to drink camel urinecan find support in the teachings of Islam in ways that followers of other religions cannot, so too can those with depraved proclivities for the dead.

 

Raymond Ibrahim, author of the new book, Sword and Scimitar, Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute and a Judith Rosen Friedman Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

 

https://www.raymondibrahim.com/

 

(pt 1)

Anonymous ID: e8eeb6 Aug. 23, 2021, 6:36 p.m. No.14441223   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1235 >>1255 >>1323

>>14441213

pt 2 Necrophilia & Islam by Scholar Raymond Ibrahim

 

RAYMOND IBRAHIM is a widely published author and public speaker specializing in the Middle East and Islam. His books include Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West (Da Capo, 2018), Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (Regnery, 2013), and The Al Qaeda Reader (Doubleday, 2007).

 

Ibrahim’s writings, translations, and observations have appeared in a variety of publications, including the New York Times Syndicate, CNN, LA Times, Fox News, Financial Times, Jerusalem Post, United Press International, USA Today, Washington Post, Washington Times, and Weekly Standard; scholarly journals, including the Almanac of Islamism, Chronicle of Higher Education, Hoover Institution’s Strategika, Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst, Middle East Quarterly, and Middle East Review of International Affairs; and popular websites, including American Thinker, Bloomberg, Breitbart, Christian Post, Daily Caller, FrontPage Magazine, NewsMax, National Review Online, PJ Media, and World Magazine. He has contributed chapters to several anthologies, written forewords to books, and been translated into dozens of languages.

 

Among other media, he has appeared on MSNBC, Fox News, C-SPAN, PBS, Reuters, Al-Jazeera, and NPR; he has done hundreds of radio interviews and some of his YouTube videos (here and here for example) have received over a million views each.

 

Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, including the U.S. Army War College and the National Defense Intelligence College; has briefed governmental agencies, such as U.S. Strategic Command and the Defense Intelligence Agency; provides expert testimony for Islam-related lawsuits; and has testified before Congress regarding the conceptual failures that dominate American discourse concerning Islam and the worsening plight of Christian minorities throughout the Islamic world. He also regularly speaks before international audiences, most recently, Germany’s Bundestag.

 

Ibrahim’s dual-background—born and raised in the U.S. by Egyptian parents born and raised in the Middle East—has provided him with unique advantages, from equal fluency in English and Arabic, to an equal understanding of the Western and Middle Eastern mindsets, positioning him to explain the latter to the former. His interest in Islamic civilization was first piqued when he began visiting the Middle East as a child in the 1970s. Interacting and conversing with the locals throughout the decades has provided him with an intimate appreciation for that part of the world, complementing his academic training.

 

After a brief athletic career—which included playing football and winning the 1993 NPC Los Angeles Bodybuilding Championship as a teenager—Raymond went on to receive his B.A. and M.A. (both in History, focusing on the ancient and medieval Near East, with dual-minors in Philosophy and English) from California State University, Fresno. There he studied closely with noted military-historian Victor Davis Hanson. He also took graduate courses at Georgetown University’s Center for Contemporary Arab Studies—including classes on the history, politics, and economics of the Arab world—and studied Medieval Islam and Semitic languages at Catholic University of America. His M.A. thesis examined an early military encounter between Islam and Byzantium based on arcane Arabic and Greek texts.

 

Ibrahim’s resume includes serving as an Arabic language and regional specialist at the Near East Section of the Library of Congress, where he was often contacted by and provided information to defense and intelligence personnel involved in the fields of counterterrorism and area studies, as well as the Congressional Research Service; and serving as Associate Director of the Middle East Forum, a Philadelphia think tank.

Anonymous ID: e8eeb6 Aug. 23, 2021, 6:41 p.m. No.14441282   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14441268

It's amazing how stupid and navel gazing people are these days. They focus on Britney Spears but not on Transhumanism which is far greater of a threat on humanity than whatever stuff she's going through. They see us as property already.