Thanks. Now if Q will please bump 40/60 to 100% to gain full trust. Only operative identities and specific sources/methods redacted. Must come out, or will happen again, quickly. In reading about Nixon and Watergate, I recall reading that many politicians privately said that the old thing Nixon did wrong was get caught. You may catch those involved with the 60%, but if the public does not know of their deeds and their methods how can they be on the lookout in the future. That is exactly what the cabal wants. We all know there are some who will escape the dragnet and are already planning on how to rebuild. It is who they are. The more people that know, the more difficult for them to operate. Also, it is NOT what I voted for. I did not vote for a 60% secret draining of the swamp. Secrecy is what got us here. Did we forget JFK's speech about secrecy? I have been very surprised to see almost zero pushback against Q's mention of 40/60 disclosure for the sake of "humanity." What hogwash. When anyone in a position of control or authority cites the greater good, they mean their good, or their bosses interests. With all of the lines about how great the N_A, and the military are, it sounds like we won't get any disclosure about their misdeeds, which are many and large. Very sad.
Two Obama college roommates are mentioned as players in the Pelican story (in b4 no more Pelicans). He looks like a younger version of one of them.
And who are you to tell us it is "over." Why so insistent. A lot of documentation. Sounds real. Just because Q did not say it, does not mean it did not happen. Sounds like a serious national security breach to go around the process for leasing a port even if the missile part is false. Or is it? Maybe it is Q related. Q did mention operators tracking cargo containers. It was presumed they were related to trafficking, but disinfo is necessary. Wouldn't want to alarm the public that baddies have missiles on wheels, would we. Is this part of the 60% we won't be told about? Hmmm.