at least you show them so we can see it's not NEW posts, but don't.
you have under 5 minutes to post NEW Q (i would say 1, but ok), and if there are plenty posts already, you shouldn't, unless you have new caps or something to add.
thanks in advance.
had you thought of checking the other possible 64s before posting? please check a bit more before coming in with condescending corrections that aren't checked (or obviously wrong since confirmed in previous bread), next time
>>1445654 just asking, if you're going to correct other anons, you should be sure to actually be correct.
>>1445825 i hear you for the slow internet, but doesn't
>mean I never post
just means, don't post the "new q" posts when they aren't new… plenty other ways to contribute, slow net or not.
truly sad that you guys thought i was mean, seriously. that was the nice version of it (though you may not think it was). just asking for better posting practices from you, and out come the feelz..
godspeed, too much time wasted on this already
yeah, pointless panic.
qanon.pub codefag is solid, nothing to worry about, just anons who have never archived offline and only rely on the archive sites, apparently
>We need a better livestream, Jesus Christ , I hate these cringy fuckers
sheesh why do you listen?
that's not our stream…