I like this line of thinking.
Great way to shut people up about forced vaccines.
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1430653040026025984
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
40m
Everyone must eat shell fish.
No exceptions for allergies or religious beliefs.
It’s for the greater good don’t be selfish.
And this:
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1430652559996243971
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
44m
Should every newborn baby be forced to ingest peanut butter, without exception and with no regard for medical history, for the greater good?
After all side effects would be rare.
'Right?
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1430653351344021508
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
42m
Are you suggesting your vaccine doesn’t work unless everyone else is vaccinated?
Yikes
.
Quote Tweet
Robja2372
@Robja23721
· 43m
Replying to @Cernovich
In your scenario, Is there a deadly and contagious disease that eating peanut butter would make undeadly?
Because otherwise the comparison is invalid.
>>14458190 <<<<
I know i thought that , too. kek
That could be a greet meme re: vaccine
"don't be shellfish"
showing forced eating of shellfish
and the side effects
It’s for the greater good don’t be shellfish.-
That could be a greet meme re: vaccine
"don't be shellfish"
showing forced eating of shellfish
and the side effects
It’s for the greater good don’t be shellfish
the peanuts as well
forced eating of peanuts
'It’s for the greater good.
Your NUTS if you dont eat peanuts!
Your SHELLFISH if you don't eat the peanuts!
Your SHELLFISH if you don't eat the shellfish!
Everyone must eat shell fish!
Everyone must eat peanuts!
No exceptions for allergies or religious beliefs.
'It’s for the greater good don’t be Shellfish!
You are NUTS!
forced eating of peanuts
'It’s for the greater good.
Your NUTS if you dont eat peanuts!
Your SHELLFISH if you don't eat the peanuts!
Your SHELLFISH if you don't eat the shellfish!
Everyone must eat shell fish!
Everyone must eat peanuts!
No exceptions for allergies or religious beliefs.
'It’s for the greater good don’t be Shellfish!
You are NUTS!
>>14458211 <<<< exzactly
let's forced this, for the greater good
dr.fauci says so:
the cure for covid
is a dick in the butthole for an hour daily at noon
you must do it for the greater good
we need proof so it must be filmed
and we need to see the film of said dick in butthole for the entire hour
before we let you in walmart to buy bread or to eat in this food establihment
i see biden as the main voice
>>14458259 i feel ya
morg sufferer here
at some point people are going to have target practice days in every state
tell her to fuck right off
shit the door
take your mask off
and love on your dad
kiss his face
hold and kiss his hands
skin to skin
invite Jeus to be in the room with you
>tell her to fuck right off
>shit the door
>take your mask off
>and love on your dad
>kiss his face
>hold and kiss his hands
>skin to skin
invite JESUS to be in the room with you
HE touched lepers with no mask
share this everywhere
https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1430659901429321731
Cernovich Retweeted
Christina Pushaw
@ChristinaPushaw
·
48m
Perhaps
@Gannett
CEO Mike Reed (he/him) or
@mwadsworth
(she/her) would like to comment? How is racist content like this cartoon by
@pnj
s
@AndyMarlette
aligned with Gannett's stated values of diversity, equity, and inclusion?
Quote Tweet
Alex Andrade
@RAlexAndradeFL
· 53m
In response to people of color voicing their frustration with white liberal @AndyMarlette ‘s objectively racist cartoon, he called POC “unreasonable” and “irrational.” He also said he could “picture a black woman saying that to a black man.” @pnj or @Gannett care to comment?
>In response to people of color voicing their frustration with white liberal @AndyMarlette ‘s objectively racist cartoon,
he called POC “unreasonable” and “irrational.”
He also said he could “picture a black woman saying that to a black man.”
@pnj or @Gannett care to comment?
https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1430661861687562240
Cernovich Retweeted
Christina Pushaw
@ChristinaPushaw
·
45m
A
@wmnf
reporter sees no problem with misogyny (or racism?) as long as it's just a cartoon.
Quote Tweet
Daniel Figueroa IV
@danuscripts
· 6h
Some of this reaction to @AndyMarlette's @ChristinaPushaw cartoon for @pnj has taught me two things today: 1. Some folks have never seen a political cartoon and 2. Lots of people don't get that "the media" is not one massive organization.
https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1430671326067429380
Cernovich Retweeted
Christina Pushaw
@ChristinaPushaw·
8m
Why is it so hard for media organizations to condemn racism and misogyny when it's from a liberal?
Quote Tweet
WMNF 88.5 FM
@wmnf
· 12m
Replying to @danuscripts @AndyMarlette and 2 others
Ah, we see she's used a good ol' whataboutism tactic.
hahahahaaaa good stuff
don't care
we already know
everything we say
we sould say in crowded room
standing up
with a name tag
>>14458385 she ain't dead
>>14458260 she ain't dead
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DYlb92zMkj41/
EVERYTHING WRONG WITH THE CAPITOL SHOOTING IN 21 MINUTES OR LESS
The Volokh Conspiracy
Opinion: Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment
2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-there-is-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/
From today’s opinion by Justice Samuel Alito (for four justices) in Matal v. Tam, the “Slants” case:
[The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote separately, also for four justices, but on this point the opinions agreed:
A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensive to some portion of the public can be turned against minority and dissenting views to the detriment of all. The First Amendment does not entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. Instead, our reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open discussion in a democratic society.
Never stop talking dankly
2017
Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment