>>1445682
Problem I have found is when we have to explain something there is so much to unpack it's impossible to believe or keep up.
For example, if you want to redpill about voter fraud they will be defensive and say "you're making it up", "barely anyone has ever been prosecuted" or "you're only saying that because ur party lost"(re: Alabama). To approach any subject u have to start with the subject that LEADS to it. Once the person your talking to understands the new info ur giving them they will be able to accept the intended info that is supported by it. In this case it may be fruitful to start with forced migration/illegal immigration. Show HOW it is happening and WHO is doing it which will lead to WHY they are doing it.
(In short) For this scenario u could start with an emotional appeal (assuming target is Liberal this will be their core belief structure). Start with Fast and Furious. Show that the gun running to Mexico has caused a Mexican genocide (Central/South American genocide too). Just simply connect the timeline of gun running to the power increase in cartels. Explain how they are murdering civilians and control the government officials. (No one will argue against this well established fact). Now connect that to our government giving them the weapons to do so. (This is provable purely by the admission of Fast and Furious's existence). Now ask them "why" that would happen (rhetorically because ur going to tell them). Explain this created the migrant crises of illegal immigration into America by families fleeing the turmoil. You will really do well to admit that you yourself feel bad for these people and wish to help but continue explaining the underlying problem. Show how certain NGO's and Democrat funded orgs have been working with these people under the guise of "humanitarian work" despite it being an intentionally manufactured crises. Show the distribution of migrants (counties) and the voting records of said areas. Show the laws those same politicians are pushing to allow those illegal immigrants the ability to skirt voting laws (motor voter, no ID, etc). Then start dropping the actual cases of voter fraud both prosecuted and simply identified. Then ask them "if these politicians were just trying to help these people solely because of their dire situations and not because they wanted their votes why would they not want to be sure there wouldn't be any voter fraud with simple laws like requiring an ID? ". From there the floor is yours to introduce Q with the NSA provided election machine programming email.
After this u can show the history of forced (encouraged/manufactured) immigration into certain countries and the birth rate differential between the native countrymen and new arrivals. That will tie right back into the voting records showing the underlying reason for mass immigration and regime changing wars that nearly everyone is against. (Ie. The Middle East, South and Central America, etc).
Ps- this could also be the segway into the voter fraud convo. Most liberals will gladly attack the Bush's over the wars in the Middle East over "muh oil money". Go with it and explain the military industrial complex, then the "migration crisises", the regime changes, the elections in new countries and then finally our current immigration crises/elections and voter fraud/manipulation. (Maybe saying the migrants are being manipulated for votes will be better then just saying they're being used for voter fraud since "voter fraud" has been turned into a dogwhistle for "muh racist").