>>pishtosh
>Don't pishposh me
oh shit
Stop fkn 'round Jim & get muh media server back up before things get out of hand
anons R precipice'n
>Is he protected by Q? He did promise that anons are safe but I'm not so sure.
anons shook the narrative in [their] heads as well debilitating the narrative across social media
the Great Meme War did too much damage to [them]
[they] shut down anons twitter fb etc
4 chan was destined to be shut down permanently if dig-meme-pray anons remained
Q provided a rally point for anon migration to safe harbor
continuous breads since Q first rallied anons
constant attacks but anons haven't stopped
Do anons really need to question whether what they do is protected?
Q3579
/agg_image_failure/
/route_DoD_11.11.18/
America Will Be Unified Again.
Future Proves Past.
Q
>However, does the protection extend beyond this board?
to what extent that is possible, maybe
best protection would be securing anon ip
if [they] are able to get ip traces, how could white hats protect a targeted anon?
>if there is such a thing as Q
(you) are posting here
& wouldn't have a chan platform to post on if it wasn't under the highest level of protection
>pull the fucking plug on the MSM.
MSM is imploding
ignore them unless you want to watch it burn
>a based /pol/lock that is literally a faggot I have my concerns that you will leave me with a child
please keep butt baby discussions on /pol/, where they belong
>secure our IP addresses from being seen by sniffers?
let's hope so
otherwise, kun's ip logs are the V& list