Precision vaccinations will fail.
Even if I use 10 different antibodies, and tailored via mapping to predict escape mutations of the virus, you will still get escape mutations in the subjects eventually even though at a decreased rate. Also, you will have people who are not vaccinated that will be generating escape mutations that you didn't map or account for. On top of that, there is a possibility the animal reservoir is reinfected with adequate ACE2 receptor binding (certain animals) and the RNA virus is mutating there. The problem with the Regen-mab's could be the length of time AB stays in your system. This duration can be a problem in both directions. There still is the possibility in the PEP group that they will be infected with a mutant not accounted for and will either not be recognized or will enhance disease. For the majority of people receiving the mAB cocktail that is not in the PEP group or the severe group in which it is contraindicated, if you are already symptomatic the virus has infected you and is already replicating….Administration can lead to a decrease in viral load but immune activation at this point and viral debris will lead to more possible cases of severe pneumonia. Although ADE is less likely due to Fc alterations, ADE is still a possibility.
If a new mutation creates a more pathogenic virus that does not fit your 2 monoclonal antibody cocktails, you will have to modify it if the escape is unrecognized. By that time treating with a drug that targets it via multiple pathways and sticking to the regimen based on the course of the disease would still be the best method to deploy (HCQ, Ivermectin, Vitamins, Budesonide, alternative steroids).
I am theorizing this escape will occur based on studies and theory of the Regen-mAB (multiple AB cocktail) which is trying to avoid mutations based on possible mapping and inclusion of future escaped virus antibodies.
It's not the flu. It's a genetically engineered coronavirus that has influenza type H/N receptor 'qualities' and similarities. It will keep mutating, you are correct. The mortality is very low with these mutants, you are correct. Hence I disagree with the current vaccination and Regen-AB cocktail protocols, especially post-exposure prophylaxis which was most likely included to make money and have more subjects.
Just to be clear, you can mutate and become more pathogenic. The possibility exists.
It's much more than pneumonia. It can theoretically get into any organ system and cell. The vaccines to spike are a bioweapon by itself. The spike via natural infection or vaccine is first and foremost a hapten. Secondly, it can activate a thrombophilic cascade. It can lead to other proteins misfolding…. and on and on.
Just because I talk smack near my computer, not with a medical dialect, that doesn't mean these politicians are brighter. They have invested money in vaccines and therapies (our money) to promote it and only lead to more problems as we are witnessing unfold. As mentioned earlier, all the problems with vaccinations and EUA medicines. Other experts warned the FDA of these consequences and what ineffective vaccines can lead to.
Now everyone is trying to do more than they should and treating people with expensive antibodies who don't need treatment.
>>Post exposure prophylaxis including BMI's greater than 25… come on…
Vaccinations are already leading to more mutations and carriers of these mutations and also putting other groups at much higher risks, including other vaccinated individuals.
There is some truth is yelling…ISOLATE THE VACCINATED
Dr. Malone… if the spike protein formed is causing so many issues, your stance is incorrect.
If you said this for vaccines targeting multiple antigens without creating spike, I would still disagree with you because the virus will just escape and you will keep trying.