>>14483501
Re-post from UK Bread. Current digs say LISAMI6 may be taken on a different evening than the TRAF_CAM pics
(Post follows)
No pics for drops? Let’s just have a chat then. We are currently discussing the possibility that the LisaMI6.png pic was taken at a different time (maybe even date) as all the other NSA_Traf_cam pics on Victoria Embankment. There are 3 trees in the span from restaurant ship HISPANIOLA’s sheltered gangway entrance to past the first gangway (the uncovered one) where the third tree lies. The third tree sits between both of the restaurant ship TATTERSHALL CASTLE’s gangways. In the LISAMI6 pic, the car with brake lights is kerbed next to this 3rd tree. But, the EMB pics show a car with brake lights betw 1st and 2nd trees. Now, if you look at the 3rd tree in EMB pics, there are what appear to be black boxes (which we believe to be trash bins) next to 3rd tree. Not so in the LISA pic. At the very least, the different parked cars configuration excludes LISAMI6 from having been taken during or near in time to the short minutes-long period captured in the TRAF_CAM sequence of pictures.
Cars can be moved; just not that fast. And trash bins not being seen in LISA would mean two possibilities: 1), LISA might have been taken BEFORE the trash bins were put out as seem in the EMBANKMENT pics. Or 2), The LISA pic could have been taken on a different evening.
We actually have SV pics on Victoria Embankment of trash bins in front of the HISPANIOLA for anons to compare to the EMB pics. Yes, not in front of TATTERSHALL CASTLE, but it is just yards away and we might assume they use the same type trash bins for pick-up
by the same trash removal service. If LISA is no longer tethered to the rest of the Victoria Embankment (EMB) pics, then what does this mean? Well, LISA is still considered to be Christmas Day2013 (+/- 1) due to the building lights config match of the MILLBANK BLDG with open source pics from Christmas Day 2013.
Now, this DOES NOT mean that the EMB pics are not still from a very close date. Prior to connecting the MILLBANK BLDG to Christmas 2013 via open source pics, we had pretty good success in narrowing the EMB pics timeframe being from the end of October 2013 to before March 2014 by observing and dating the emplacement of construction shrouds on Westminster Palace and the First-Aid sign on Northumberland. We also had a ROT1 picture match with open source pics for a sidewalk sign on 22DEC2013, and a video match from (I can’t recall the exact date.) The Bazalgette Memorial pic we found was the ONLY pic match for that marker seen in ROT1.
What is implied? Either two visits that same night, with LISA occuring prior to EMB,or moar than one visit on a different evening. We always knew the LISAMI6 pic was taken by hand right? The camera position of LISA, although taken from Hungerford Bridge, is quite a way from where the alleged traffic cam position is. The CH series appears also to have been by a hand-held camera, starting at the top of the steps of Hungerford Bridge and descending to street level. Perhaps the LISA pic, showing a car with its brakelights on, is a crumb to point us at the other pics of a car, possibly the same car, now in a different kerb position, with brakelights on giving us the notion that maybe what has been captured is not one but two occurrances.
Some thoughts on LISA: Hand-held. In just the right place and time to catch someone pulling up? Assuming for the sake of discussion that the car with brakelights might be what we were intended to see, how could cameraman get on the bridge to watch that car park at that location? Possibly knew it was going to park there based on prior occursnces? One should ask, What if the pic taken shows the car leaving? Whether or not the high-values were areiving or departing, we were not shown them approaching or leaving the cars. They certainly could have shown that but didn’t. So, if we are not meant to identify the persons in this LISA pic, then what was it meant to impart? Nothing is dropped without a reason.
If one unreported visit with an intelligence service can be denied as an approach and rebuff of that intelligence service, then what can be inferred from two visits?
GoggleEarth sauce:
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5058466,-0.1226805,3a,60.3y,171.56h,92.52t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1svEVlKIdgdHUXut1qXvxM8Q!2e0!5s20120901T000000!7i13312!8i6656