Anonymous ID: e1e69a Aug. 29, 2021, 5:39 p.m. No.14488705   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14488501

slightly condensed for short attention span

 

I am trying to work the angle of the EUA and the claims of some that the approval is a complete fraud. I firmly believe the FDA approval has been taken completely out of context but I cannot find a smoking gun per se’ to use in my defense.

In my readings it clearly states (from 8-23-21) the Pfizer BLA (Biologics License Application) has been approved but in the same breadth the FDA also sts it has extended the EUA from a letter posted 8-12-21. The EUA has been amended to include the use of COMIRNATY in ages 12-15 for a two dose series and to provide a third dose for age 12 and older in cases where it is determined the patient is immunocompromised; whereas they go into detail giving an example of a solid organ transplant patient. It sts, Comirnaty is an FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccine made by Pfizer for biontech that is approved as two dose series for prevention of Covid-19 in individuals age 16 and older. That leads one to believe it has full FDA approval. However towards the end of the fact sheet it sts;

“This EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COMIRNATY will end when the Secretary of HHS determines that the circumstances justifying the EUA no longer exist or when there is a change in the approval status of the product such that an EUA is no longer needed.”

Which can be found here:

http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471&format=pdf

I believe they have executed a play on words which is being pushed by the DS media platforms to create an echo chamber to inject a blatant lie which emboldens employers, county/state elected officials, school district leaders etc. to implement vax mandates.

 

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/reference-product-exclusivity-biological-products-filed-under-section-351a-phs-act

Quote from above link: “The BPCI Act amends the PHS Act and other statutes to create an abbreviated licensure pathway for biological products shown to be biosimilar to, or interchangeable with, an FDA-licensed biological reference product.”

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/deemed-be-license-provision-bpci-act

Quote from above link: On March 23, 2020, the BPCI Act requires that an approved marketing application for a “biological product” under section 505 of the FD&C Act shall be deemed to be a license for the biological product (i.e., an approved BLA) under section 351 of the PHS Act.

I tried to find Pfizers BLA application in hopes to discover exactly what was applied for, any ideas on how to obtain that?

Anonymous ID: e1e69a Aug. 29, 2021, 5:53 p.m. No.14488779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14488705

>>14488501

 

even more condensed version for fucks sake

 

“The BPCI Act amends the PHS Act and other statutes to create an abbreviated licensure pathway for biological products shown to be biosimilar to, or interchangeable with, an FDA-licensed biological reference product.”

 

"On March 23, 2020, the BPCI Act requires that an approved marketing application for a “biological product” under section 505 of the FD&C Act shall be deemed to be a license for the biological product (i.e., an approved BLA) under section 351 of the PHS Act."

 

LOOK SAUCE:

 

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/reference-product-exclusivity-biological-products-filed-under-section-351a-phs-act

 

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/deemed-be-license-provision-bpci-act