reading this, interesting.
>https://rumble.com/vlr945-what-joe-biden-gave-the-taliban-a-kill-list-of-our-citizens-and-allies.html
notable
the worst outcome for Dems is getting caught rigging the vote against Elder and losing their hold on black voters
>There is no such thing, my friends, as a trusted source. I am not a trusted source.
if this is Ewillhelpyou, I have indeed noticed you shilling against Dennis Montgomery.
yeah, they're losing it either way
wait till everyone sees all the forged votes they put in for black people
anyone who hasn't changed the hosts file but is thinking about it, I'd suggest going without the pics for a while if you don't know where those IP addresses go. Yeah I heard Jim vouched for it. Still wouldn't do it.
heres another one:
if you see anyone repeating the character attacks on Dennis Montgomery, they're lying about him or or being lied to.
impossible to make those kind of mistakes by accident
I wrote about that match a few years ago but it might not make sense anymore:
#332523 at 2018-02-11 03:46:08 (UTC+1)
Q Research General #408: Unalienable Rights Edition
>>324405 [e]
>>324477 [5]
>>324485 [-]
chess fag here.
The game Assange referenced was Capablanca-Marshall in 1918.
Relevant to the theory that Trump met with Kissinger to discuss a prisoner swap, after the capture in Shanghai tower.
Walk-through of the chess match for reference
>https:// www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=68&v=eaUHECHqcWs
The action is at 1:08.
Capablanca is White. The match is famous for Marshall Gambit, when Black (Marshal) (instead of moving D-column Pawn up one square to support his other center pan) moves up 2 squares to d5 to threaten e4 white Pawn. Pieces are swapped and black gives a knight and 2 pawns for a white knight and 1 white pawn, losing a pawn in the exchange.
It's a gambit because black is trading a pawn for better position on the board. It appears to work, until Capablanca turns the table on him.
Turning the tables = VINTAGE TRUMP.
E5 is the square where they trade knights.
>White takes pawn with knight
>Black takes knight with knight
>White takes Knight with Rook
Going with the Shanghai analogy I think it's more likely that Trump captured a knght (valuable piece) than a pawn.
Q posts:
E
5
>White rook takes black knight
>exchange completed
>DOPEY released for intel leading to capture of [ ] in Shanghai
or
>deal made with Kissinger concerning capture in Shanghai
-
>(Black's move)
here's the post. links to an audio that doesnt play.
https://t.me/jim_watkins/852
>The media server is offline until I find a new host for the media server.
>https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/14467915.html#q14468268
youre the one who's conflating them
boomers fell for all the jewish tricks. the generations before them did too though.
>Attorneys for Adam Fox, Barry Croft, Kaleb Franks, Daniel Harris, and Brandon Caserta
how many are jews
at least 2 had nosejobs
when Lindberg stood up and said WW2 was a jewish war, no one joined him.
America had long recovered from the Depression by the late 30s
far more millenials are aware of the jewish problem than boomers. They were brainwashed by Viet Nam era and didnt have the internet and now they're too old to change.
looks like gen x is running the countercoup
>far more millenials are aware of the jewish problem than boomers. They were brainwashed by Viet Nam era and didnt have the internet and now they're too old to change.
>looks like gen x is running the countercoup
meant for >>14489451
nice reddit space, jew lover
then I'm wrong, I was going by what they taught in (((high school))). Lindberg made the speech in 1941. The people who didn't stand up with him were the aristocrats not the commoners, maybe not fair to judge the whole generation by them. But they fucking blew it.