https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/09/a_covid_testing_facility_in_colorado_reveals_the_con_behind_the_panic.html

September 3, 2021

A COVID testing facility in Colorado reveals the con behind the panic

By Andrea Widburg

<snip>

As for the vaccination, it's pretty clear that it's useless against the delta variant. Thankfully, the delta variant isn't that severe (as is often the case as viruses mutate their way through communities). In addition, if you're like Joe Rogan and have access to ivermectin, you may do just fine.

All in all, the brilliant Candace Owens took what a leftist intended as a monumental, principled stand against "bad" people and turned it around to reveal the terrible hypocrisy and cruelty lurking behind everything that leftists are doing.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/09/02/a-look-at-scientific-evidence-suggesting-face-masks-damage-your-health/

A Look At Scientific Evidence Suggesting Face Masks Damage Your Health

Scientists have found significant impaired thinking or concentration after only 100 minutes of mask use, correlating significantly with reduced blood oxygen levels in the test subjects.

As mask mandates and habits return across the United States, clear and convincing scientific data from before and after 2020 suggest masking has negative health consequences that outweighs its utility.

Earlier this year, a group of German doctors and biomedical scientists looked at the available data on the negative health effects of face masks, published both before and during the COVID-19 outbreak, as catalogued in the U.S. federal government’s biomedical database, PubMed. They found significant evidence of “relevant, undesired medical, organ and organ system-related phenomena accompanied by wearing masks,” with “clear, scientifically recorded adverse effects for the mask wearer.”

<snip>

Violations of Informed Consent

The Food and Drug Administration defines and regulates face masks as medical devices when used for protection against COVID-19. A year and a half into the pandemic, significant medical information that face masks may pose serious health and safety risks is now available.

Certainly, medical information promoting the safety and utility of wearing face masks is also available (mostly limited to studies on wear times of an hour or less), but doctors must provide patients with all significant medical information. Instead, information about the negative health effects of face masking is mostly limited to medical literature. The public remains uninformed, its consent overruled by mandates.

Given the known health risks of masking, the courts should apply the doctrine of informed consent to mask mandate challenges. Other ways to fight against masking in court, like product liability lawsuits against mask manufacturers, should also be considered by enterprising libertarian lawyers. May a thousand class actions bloom, and may we all get the right to breathe free.

https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/cbp-seizes-fbi-badges/

Border Officials Seize Counterfeit FBI Badges From China.

September 3, 2021 Natalie Winters

U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials have seized several counterfeit Federal Bureau of Investigation and Drug Enforcement Administration badges shipped from China.

As an agency press release notes, “officers at the Chicago International Mail Branch (IMF) recently seized several packages all arriving from China that contained counterfeit Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) badges.”

In the following week, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials busted additional shipments containing over two dozen counterfeit DEA badges.

“These counterfeit badges could have led to disastrous consequences if our officers had not found them,” said LaFonda Sutton-Burke, Director of Chicago CBP’s Field Operations. “Criminal organizations could have used these badges for their illicit activity under the guise of federal agents. Our CBP officers were able to identify these very realistic counterfeits and stop them from reaching their destinations.”

>>14514917

>Use JPG not PNG so I can see yours.

For me jpg, png and gifs work fine.

>>14514939

{

var links = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('a'))

var imageLinks = links.filter(l =/.media.8kun.top./ig.test(l.href))

imageLinks.forEach(link ={

var n = Math.floor(Math.random() * 77777777777) + 1

var pieces = link.href.split('/')

var filename = pieces[pieces.length-1]

var [hash, extension] = filename.split('.')

var href = ${link.href.replace("media.","sys.")}/${hash}.jpg?n=${n}

var imgs = link.querySelectorAll('img')

imgs.forEach(i =i.src = href)

link.href = href

})

}

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/09/why_all_the_fuss_about_ivermectin.html

September 3, 2021

Why all the fuss about Ivermectin?

By Brian C. Joondeph

First hydroxychloroquine, now ivermectin, is the hated deadly drug de jour, castigated by the medical establishment and regulatory authorities. Both drugs have been around for a long time as FDA-approved prescription medications. Yet now we are told they are as deadly as arsenic.

As a physician, I am certainly aware of ivermectin but don’t recall ever writing a prescription for it in my 30+ years’ medical career. Ivermectin is an anthelmintic, meaning it cures parasitic infections. In my world of ophthalmology, it is used on occasion for rare parasitic or worm infections in the eye.

Ivermectin was FDA approved in 1998 under the brand name Stromectol, produced by pharmaceutical giant Merck, approved for several parasitic infections. The product label described it as having a “unique mode of action,” which “leads to an increase in the permeability of the cell membrane to chloride ions.” This suggests that ivermectin acts as an ionophore, making cell membranes permeable to ions that enter the cell for therapeutic effect.

Ivermectin is one of several ionophores, others including hydroxychloroquine, quercetin, and resveratrol, the latter two available over the counter. These ionophores simply open a cellular door, allowing zinc to enter the cell, where it then interferes with viral replication, providing potential therapeutic benefit in viral and other infections.

<snip>

The FDA says ivermectin “can be dangerous and even lethal,” yet they approved it in 1998 and have not pulled it from the market despite it being “dangerous and lethal.” Any medication can be “dangerous and lethal” if misused. People have even overdosed on water.

It is true that ivermectin is also used in animals, as are many drugs approved for human use. This is a list of veterinary drugs with many familiar names of antibiotics, antihypertensives, and anesthetics commonly used by humans. Since these drugs are used in farm animals, should humans stop taking them? That seems a rather unscientific argument against ivermectin, especially coming from the FDA.

And healthcare professionals are not recommending or prescribing animal versions of ivermectin as there is an FDA-approved human formulation.

Does ivermectin work against COVID? That is the bigger question and worthy of investigation, rather than reminding people that they are not cows.

A study published several months ago in the American Journal of Therapeutics concluded,

Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

To my knowledge, these 18 studies have not been retracted, unlike previous studies critical of hydroxychloroquine which were ignominiously retracted by prestigious medical journals like The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine.

Yet the medical establishment refuses to even entertain the possibility of some benefit from ivermectin, castigating physicians who want to try it in their patients. 18 studies found benefit. Are they all wrong?

<more>

https://andmagazine.com/talk/2021/09/01/flashback-why-the-who-faked-a-pandemic-2010/

Flashback: ‘Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic’

As it turns out, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been involved in “sky is falling” and the “pandemic is killing us all” rhetoric before. A Forbes article from 2010, “Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic,” detailing the WHO’s actions in what one epidemiologist declared was a “false pandemic” was removed from their site, but retrieved and recently posted online by Scott Jackson III (@ScottJa93317027 on Twitter). The Forbes article details the 1976 swine flu pandemic.

<snip>

As governments worldwide put in place vaccine mandates, lockdowns, and attempt to implement vaccine passports, it is worth noting that the “information” that is put out by our own CDC and NIH should perhaps remain suspect. That is particularly true when one considers the effort that the U.S. government and the media, including social media outlets, have put into censoring anyone – particularly well-respected physicians and researchers – who are trying to challenge the “narrative” with actual science and facts.

Without a doubt, the efforts being put into this “pandemic” this time around are the strongest and perhaps most effective we have seen. We have never seen huge swaths of the western world, in particular, succumb to these efforts – massive lockdowns that closed small businesses while huge corporate businesses flourished. We now have many in the U.S. degrading their fellow citizens who either cannot medically take the Covid vaccines or have religious or other reasons for not wanting to take the vaccines. If you search through social media, the message to those not accepting the “narrative” that we must mask, we “must” take the vaccines – everyone, no exceptions!

This ‘take the vax’ narrative continues despite the fact that the Director of the CDC is on record (we still have the video) stating that the Covid jabs do not prevent transmission or infection. How much cognitive dissonance has to exist to hear that statement from the CDC, at the same time it is very clear from reporting across the world that the vaccinated are contracting and dying from Covid. Increasingly, as is the case in Israel and other locations, the vaccinated are starting to be the majority of those in hospitals.

<more>

https://thefederalist.com/2021/09/01/dr-scott-atlas-science-killed-itself-over-covid-19/

Dr. Scott Atlas: Science Killed Itself Over COVID-19

'Science is not supposed to be about intimidating, or abusing, or censoring data … There is never supposed to be 'an accepted view' of science.'

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the American people have been told to “follow the science.” Yet for a year and a half, they’ve heard contradicting messages from self-appointed prophets of “the science” like Dr. Anthony Fauci and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

We learned that politicians who claimed their decisions were science-driven often ignored scientific findings that didn’t fit certain political narratives. We discovered that scientists are fallible human beings, and some would let personal interests and political views cloud their judgment.

<snip>

Never Let Lockdowns Destroy Lives Again

Lockdowns destroyed people, Atlas said, by “shutting down medical care, stopping people from seeking emergency medical care, increasing drug abuse, increasing death by suicide, more psychological damage, particularly among the younger generation. Hundreds and thousands of child abuse cases went unreported. Teenagers’ self-harm cases have tripled.”

<more>