Why we are all going to lose. The law prevents winning.

1917

The Espionage Act of 1917 is a United States federal law passed on June 15, 1917, shortly after the U.S. entry into World War I. It has been amended numerous times over the years. It was originally found in Title 50 of the U.S. Code (War & National Defense) but is now found under Title 18 (Crime & Criminal Procedure). Specifically, it is 18 U.S.C. ch. 37 (18 U.S.C. § 792 et seq.)

It was intended to prohibit interference with military operations or recruitment, to prevent insubordination in the military, and to prevent the support of United States enemies during wartime. In 1919, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled through Schenck v. United States that the act did not violate the freedom of speech of those convicted under its provisions. The constitutionality of the law, its relationship to free speech, and the meaning of its language have been contested in court ever since.

Noted Cases

In June 1971, Daniel Ellsberg and Anthony Russo were charged with a felony under the Espionage Act of 1917, because they lacked legal authority to publish classified documents that came to be known as the Pentagon Papers.

Also:

Chelsea Manning

Reality Leigh Winner

Julian Assange

>>14516257

We're in a war. They have all the tools,; intel, doctors, military, banks, cops, comms, agencies, departments and bureaus. We have censored truth. Trump and the "patriots" have a castle and a golf course and a popcorn machine. For us, this war will last as long as we can stay alive. For them, it's already over and they've declared victory, seized the seat of power and are destroying everything good about our country from within, while hiding behind "State Secrets" laws. We were always just peasants. Now, thanks the "The Great Awakening" we are disabused on the notion that we ever were or will be a free nation. Welcome to prison.

I don't know why any woman would want to birth a child into this prison system. Planned parenthood deprives the medical establishment by denying them the ability to stab, cut, and jab the innocent for much higher profits until the babies grow into unprofitable seniors. The banks don't get to earn interest on student loans and mortgages from aborted babies. The military doesn't get their chance to send them to "die for their country". The State misses their chance to abduct them into foster care, and the prisons lose a potential inmate. I can see why so many are against abortion.

>>14516647

There's an entire culture in SW China that doesn't have marriage or abortion. They also don't kick kids out at 18. Families there stay together. Men go sleep at their girlfriends famiky's house when they are in town, but the woman's family takes care of their young.

Marriage is yet another satanic trap.

Chinese Tribe Without Marriage Points to Future

11/22/2013 07:08 pm ET Updated Jan 25, 2014

The Mosuo people of southwest China do not marry and fathers do not live with, or support, children. Do the Mosuo anticipate a global future where no one marries?

Whether the Mosuo have marriage depends upon what you mean by marriage. Their mating system is called “walking marriage“ where the man and woman do not live together even though they sleep together.

As soon as she is sexually mature, a young woman gets her own bedroom and may invite a man to spend the night with her. If babies are produced from these informal unions, they are raised by the mother with the help of her siblings and the father does not provide economic support.

So far, it might seem that this is no different from a women in a modern society having one night stands and opting to become pregnant as a result. Yet, walking marriages are not necessarily casual relationships. In general, they seem to be long-standing arrangements that can even last for a lifetime.

Moreover, Mosuo women generally know the paternity of the children and the father is ceremonially welcomed by children on special occasions, such as Chinese New Year. So, however minimal they are, walking marriages include one key feature of other marriages, namely the joining of a kin network.

What is conspicuously missing is the economic support that married fathers around the world are expected to provide for their children in return for the opportunity of fathering children of the marriage.

The avunculate

How could such a seemingly unbalanced version of marriage come to exist? Anthropologists offer some clues because there are other societies where fathers invest little in children of their marriage. Instead, they become attached to children of their sisters — a phenomenon known as the avunculate.

The avunculate likely exists because a husband’s confidence of paternity of children of the marriage is low. Whether this is true of the Mosuo is unknown.

Apart from low confidence of paternity, there is another good reason that men (and women) might choose to care for their nieces and nephews as though they were offspring. It might be a response to the difficult living conditions of the Himalayas. After all, such conditions in Tibet may be responsible for the very unusual marriage system of polyandry where a pair of brothers shares a bride.

Yet another possible reason for walking marriage is that Mosuo men used to be long-distance traders who were absent for long periods in trading caravans.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mosuo-tribe-no-marriage_b_4310981

>>14516734

The Espionage Act of 1917 prevents anyone "in the know" from talking, including Trump. State Secrets + Secret Societies = today's reality.

>>14516820

In the KJV, Lord = King. So trust your King, Joe Biden.

Bad advice.

Satan fell to earth and a third of the angels fell with him.

A third = 33%

33

Who wrote the bible? Who built the cathedrals?