California anon getting ready to vote in the governor recall election trying to figure out the best way to vote for forensic audit traceability. I voted in person during the presidential election but my county has moved to electronic voting with a printed paper record. My thought is if you can fully print the record there is no forensic paper traceability because you can just print a new record. Vote by mail results in a traceable envelope that went through the USPS mail system which should have some record of movement both on the envelope and within the USPS sorting system. The ballot inside is marked by me and folded so some auditable mechanical distortion of the paper and ballot marking compared to the in person printed record. I think mail has better traceability than using a drop box where there will be no record of movement or entry/exit of the mail sorting system. Any anons have a different opinion? Losing the ballot somewhere in the mail system is a real possibility. I expect fuckery to an extreme in this election and already see calls for a forensic audit so I would like to make my ballot as traceable and verifiable as authentic as possible.
I suggest it is time for the answer.
Scientists Once Thought Personality Was Set in Stone. They Were Wrong
https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/scientists-once-thought-personality-was-set-in-stone-they-were-wrong
The rats had previously been infected with Toxoplasma gondii, a brain parasite that, as the scientists running the trials were learning, considerably altered the way the rats behaved. Not only did they display this potentially fatal, certainly ill-advised feline attraction, but they were also more eager to explore the maze than uninfected animals were. For better or for worse, their rat “personality” had changed towards a higher level of openness to experience.