Anonymous ID: a647c5 Jan. 24, 2018, 12:47 a.m. No.145551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5590 >>5817

Time we talk about Adm. Rogers.

 

>Anons hate NSA for collecting pics of their tiny weeners

>Obama Appointee

>Q drops 40k ft redpill

>Tells us how smart and good we are

>Autist splooge everywhere

>Q says Adm R not comped

 

>TRUST Adm R.

>He played the game to remain in >control.

>Q

 

>Now Anons love Adm R

>Adm R retiring soon

>Think Logically

 

What part of the game that Adm R played and how did he not become comped. THE FUCKING WHOLE POINT OF THE GAME IS TO MAKE SURE POWER IS COMPED. Didn't J Molesta know NSA is critical to control of the game? Could he possibly make a miscalculation of this magnitude?

 

>NSA director is traditionally .mil

>No comped mil?

>Calculated risk by cabal?

 

Did Adm R just play:

chain of command?

dem?

 

Then why is he retiring now and who will take his place?

And who will head new Cyber Command?

 

Q?

Anonymous ID: a647c5 Jan. 24, 2018, 1:03 a.m. No.145596   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>145585

Yes, although putting a man in control of his own compromise would be really dumb.

 

There are relevant wikileaks docs from Obama transition.