dChan
Anonymous ID: 970712 Sept. 6, 2021, 7:01 a.m. No.14529933   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9942

>>14529855

 

>>14529448

>EPSTEIN COURT DOCUMENTS UNSEALED

NOT ACCURATE - RESEARCH MOAR

 

Case is:

''' Latham v. The 1953 Trust (1:20-cv-07102)

District Court, S.D. New York'''

 

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/latham-v-the-1953-trust/

 

Case was dismissed on 20 Sept 2020, but looks like Latham is trying to appeal due to mail issues.

 

CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 9/18/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (Entered: 09/25/2020)

 

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/4/latham-v-the-1953-trust/

Anonymous ID: 970712 Sept. 6, 2021, 7:35 a.m. No.14530082   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14529987

Conjecture at this point.

 

>>14530030

see

>>14529942

(or did you conveniently ignore that?)

Latham v. The 1953 Trust (1:20-cv-07102)

District Court, S.D. New York

 

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18196132/latham-v-the-1953-trust/

 

United States v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330)

District Court, S.D. New York

 

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17318376/united-states-v-maxwell/

 

Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433)

District Court, S.D. New York

 

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/

Anonymous ID: 970712 Sept. 6, 2021, 7:44 a.m. No.14530117   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0147

>>14530088

Elite wasn't just a computer game? Kek.

 

>>14530052

>I have yet to see a single convincing argument for flat earth.

 

Given that anons should question everything, how convincing is the argument for a globe hurtling through space? It's what we've always been told, but at this point it's dogma like most other things - there's plenty of holes in most NASA stuff. The video (the long version) raises many queestions about what we've been told to believe.