>there are a few mentions of "watch the water"
I've watched the first 4 hours so far. In addition to watch the water he has also said:
"precipice"
"the stage is set"
"you have more than you know"
gave me major fucking goose bumps!
you have more than you know was a reference to the building windows being partly underground iirc.
Lavrov: Russia will support formation of new Afghan government if it is inclusive
(39 minutes ago)
https://twitter.com/SputnikInt
"We want to support the process of formation of a government that will reflect the whole spectrum of the Afghan society, including the Taliban and other ethnic groups apart from the Pashtuns: the Hazaras, the Uzbeks, the Tajiks. Only an inclusive government can ensure a steady transition to a new life …
>I saw that part but missed the "more than you know" reference. Guess I need to pay closer attention.
No he talks about this more than once. And when you get to the part where he says the stage is set - he literally shows a cartoon image of a stage w/ curtains and the words "The Stage Is Set" - keep watching you'll get to it.
>Since you're much further in than I am
I forgot to mention that there are 2 versions - the one I've been watching is 6 hours long on rumble.
https://rumble.com/vicf89-the-lost-history-of-the-flat-earth.html
As for flat earth, here's what I can't wrap my head around as a thought experiment:
If you take a tricked out military helicopter that weighs a couple tons and can hold 12 hours of fuel, and you raise it into the air on a day with no wind and just hold it steady, shouldn't the helicopter end up half way around the world 12 hours later? I have yet to see a satisfactory answer for this and other thought experiments.
I don't know either anon. He's got a lot of explaining left to do in the last 2 hours. I'll definitely watch though because I'm intrigued.
>It is, technically, in orbit.
Maybe. But no loss of momentum in 12 hours?
Does a plane expend more fuel going in the opposite direction of the spinning globe compared to one going in the same direction?
I don't know. Something seems off to me.
>Compared to a giant plate hurtling through space?
It's not hurtling through space though - the theory is that it's a stationary plane. The stars and planets moving across the sky give the illusion the planet is spinning. Also notice the word planet has "plane" in it.
And Q said "They thought you would follow the stars." (just sayin')
>If the atmosphere didn't move with the earth you would have a 1,000 mph wind blowing at ground level all the time.
So if you flew a plane into the opposite direction of the spinning, wouldn't you expend twice as much fuel to overcome the momentum?
Does a plane flying half way around the world have to keep steering down every now and then to prevent flying into outer space on a straight line?
Don't know either.. Interesting to think about though.