>with no real basis for doing so
Everything you are saying it logical, except those in category "A" believe those in "B" aren't doing enough to "get our normal back". The real problem is those in category "A" haven't yet realized there's no going back to "normal". Even Pfizer is getting in on the game ahead of schedule because they see the vaccines as starting to become a less viable option in the long run:
Q drop:
https://qanon.pub/#735
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 540a54 No.343019 📁
Feb 11 2018 19:38:19 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 91a1c7 No.342919 📁
Feb 11 2018 19:32:20 (EST)
>>342895
Q, how long will we have to wait for the cures of cancer and other sicknesses?
>>342919
Chatter amongst those in control has begun.
They know we know which means the public will know.
Release prior to cover up.
Public informed and collapse.
Which option?
Q
Imagine if Q and White Hats simply came out and started dropping the cures to most yearly/seasonal ailments? It'd be rejected like HCQ was, and that's what started the controversy for many to suddenly realize "Hey, why are they suppressing cures?" Here we are, a year a 3 variants later discussing why companies like Pfizer are getting in on the prophylactic and therapeutic game:
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1434927554104864772
@PapiTrumpo
I don't know who needs to hear this, but Pfizer is developing it's own ivermectin knockoff…
-BREAK-
If you are paying attention, you see how the game is being played. Taking out time, doing this "beautiful brave new world" together, one step at a time, is waking everyone up. Good news is, we should be near the finish line sometime around 2024; though life will be different by that time. Much different. Keep spreading truth.