notable
that's a go to in any anon's medicine cabinet
worthy of instameme… but alas
>🤔
>Let me see if I understand this properly. Person A feels that they need the vaccine to be protected, so they get vaccinated. However, Person A doesn't feel protected unless Person B also gets the vaccine. And if Person B refuses to get the vaccine, Person A shames them until they do.
>Let's take this a step further. Person A, who is vaccinated, can still catch and transmit the virus, but is not subjected to going through daily/weekly testing. Person B, who is not vaccinated, and who can catch and transmit the virus, has to go through daily/weekly testing and potential quarantine. Why does Person A not have to go through testing and quarantine if they can still catch and transmit the virus?
>And to go even further than that: Person A is vaccinated and, even though they can catch and transmit the virus, can walk into any number of locations that state they will only allow the vaccinated inside. Person B is not vaccinated and, even though they may test negative for the virus, are not allowed inside any of the locations that state they will only allow the vaccinated inside.
>Wanna piece this together now? It boils simply down to segregation and discrimination with no real basis for doing so.
>1. Person A is vaccinated.
>2. Person B is not vaccinated.
>3. Both Person A and Person B can catch and transmit the virus.
>4. Person A does not have to get tested, but Person B does.
>5. Person A can go wherever they want, but Person B cannot.
>6. Person A is allowed to live their lives, while Person B cannot.
>7. Person A perpetuates the shaming of Person B by stating that Person B needs to be vaccinated for Person A to be protected.
>Anybody disagree with anything I just said? You do? Then go look this up because this is all fact. Nothing I typed above is untrue; you need only read the news to see that this is exactly what is happening.
>If your shot works, why do I need one? If your shot doesn't work, why should I get one