>>14534114

>allies (the Allies) took control of the country.

So why did the allies spare the rich citizens like the QUANDT family despite being directly involved in slave labor?

Why did the allies spare the Nazi-judges?

Why did the allies spare companies that used slave labor like Siemens?

Why were laws created by Hitler not abolished?

Why was the RKI institute not closed down after all their experiments on concentration camp inmates?

Why were the so called medical doctors spared that were involved in these experiments?

Operation paperclip?

>>14534180

I don't speak German.

>>14534193

I still do not speak German.

>>14534197

Why would I google translate someone, who speaks foreign languages in the General?

>>14534201

>curiosity

I asked questions.

Any real anon would have answered them using the language used in the General, which is English.

Wasting my time on a shill would be wasting my time.

>>14534206

>has something else happened to the site re images/java ?

Yes.

Around a day ago 8kun added a forward for any image request to vanwatech.

That's why JS isn't working, because the other location where images were stored doesn't return images anymore.

>>14534209

>rhetorical

Why do you think they are thetorical?

I want answers to these questions.

If the Allies were actual enemies of the Nazis, I would expect them to do what I wrote, but that didn't happen to my knowledge.

>>14534219

Speak English.

You are glowing hard.

>>14534224

No idea.

>>14534225

>they already had their scapegoats at Nuremburg.

If that was the case, Nuremburg was a show trial and no actual justice was done, similar to current times.

Why would that be especially when so many people died?

Concentration camps were and still are called so evil, same for slave labor, but the families that profited weren't punished for any of that?

What does that tell you?

Does it make sense to you?

A few families executed would not have destroyed the industrial base, which were the workers, but in fact tons were starved after the war. Again: does this make any sense?

Why are the rich not punished, but the regular workers are?

>Maybe to maintain existing "stability".

Again, does this make sense?

These judges were evil to the core, they knew that what they did was not okay. But they were kept? And that's supposed to be about stability?

So you keep judges who do not really do their jobs, but sentence people to death willy nilly, and that's supposed to be stability?

You keep Nazis in power for stability, although you say that they are the most evil enemies you ever faced?

That makes no sense to me.

>>14534233

So you finally follow orders after a while.

Thank you kindly.

But I see, waste of time. Glad I didn't use google translate.

>>14534248

>I do think Nuremburg was a show trial

That's what I think as well.

It's all a stupid show, still this implies that they weren't real enemies to begin with, otherwise none of it makes any sense.

Not only were the ultra rich families not punished, they were able to keep all of their (illegal) wealth, meanwhile regular Germans were shamed for the "German crimes" (of the rich), which makes it all even more ridiculous.

German judges had the power to leave the country, but they didn't.

Regular Germans didn't have the power to leave the country.

The latter is blamed for following orders and laws, while the former isn't punished at all (there may have been exceptions, but what does it matter, actual justice would have punished them all).

>>14534261

pills.

>>14534272

How many were actually punished?

And is there even a way to verify that they were in fact punished?

Videos can not be trusted.

>>14534291

Are we even certain that this is supposed to be the future and not already the present?

Maybe it's a memorial site?

>>14534300

I'm surprised it's on Blu-ray.

Other movies like "Wag the Dog" aren't.

I wonder why (that's rhetorical)

>>14534303

>Predictive Programming, my fren.

That makes sense now.

>>14534208

M(asonic)TV

>>14534336

>>14534274

>>14534269

https://anonfiles.com/RepfmcGdu5/Rick_Bright_former_head_of_BARDA_and_now_with_The_Rockefeller_Foundation_explains_how_he_sabotaged_the_Emergency_Use_Authorization_of_Hydroxychloroq_mp4

There ya go

>>14534348

vvalkyrie still in effect

>>14534351

>Rick

>>14534370

>The camps were labor camps

So forced labor is acceptable?

>The people who died were killed by Typhus

Sure?

All?

What happens to me when I'm locked in a forced labor camp and refuse to work?

>>14534370

>The camps were labor camps, not death camps.

btw. what about the medical experiments?

https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Institute/History/rk_ns_node_en.html

The fact that RKI scientists and external research scientists attached to Robert Koch Institute had been involved in inhuman experiments in concentration camps and psychiatric institutions was already known.

https://www.nature.com/articles/456575a

>>14534397

>you go in the "cooler" or they shoot you in the head or beat you within an inch of your life

So you die because someone killed you, not because of Typhus.

Thanks for clearing that up.

>>14534400

>only that the camps were forced labor camps

medical experiments too.

>Of course, some inmates were executed by shooting, or killed by overwork etc.

You wrote:

>The people who died were killed by Typhus

>>14534415

On top of that everyone got brainwashed.

And I mean everyone.

>>14534429

>Don't be a troll.

You wrote that "everyone died because muh Typhus" and then you wrote "of course some were executed, or killed"

So which one is it?

Did Typhus pull the trigger?

You stated one thing, and then stated another thing shortly afterwards.

Slave labor camps are automatically death camps, because tons of people die there, happens everywhere, also happens in China

All you are doing is playing a definitions game.

Any government locking people up in slave labor camps has no problem with all of these people dying.

Also question:

let's say Bidan puts you in a concentration camp, I mean quarantine camp and you fear for your life (which makes sense, because your life is actually in great danger) and you hear stories about people getting killed (this may even be fiction, but you don't know that, you can't know that) and you tell that later to other people.

Are you lying in such a case?

Nazis let the Rothschild go, kept the others in camps. Think about that for a moment.

>>14534464

>1666 Sabbatean-Frankist Illuminati History

Probably this:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/m4wX4da6bnzU/

>Occult Illuminati Religion and New World Order Agenda

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gZy3gx1H1WA/

>>14534499

>I don't think you are arguing in good faith so this will be my last post to you

I do.

Slave labor camps means you get worked to death. If you refuse you may just get beaten, in any case they don't give a shit about your health. If you can't work anymore, you are useless, just like most are seen as useless eaters. That's a fact.

>There is a big difference

>because numbers game.

Not for the individual that experienced hell.

And of course millions of others experienced hell as well. It's not limited to these people.

I even doubt the official 9/11 deaths, but that doesn't matter in the end to the people who actually died on 9/11.

>Why didn't Rothschild (a satanist) do more or pay Hitler to save his supposed co-religionists (jews)? Now that's a good question.

See, now you are thinking.

They don't give a shit about them, except their own. They are pawns as well, which was my point.

>As I said, I think you are starting to sound like a shill.

Why? Because I asked uncomfortable questions and called you out on your post stating that EVERYONE in the (FORCED) LABOR CAMPS died because Typhus?

>>14534557

>you seem very naive

It seems you are more autistic than I am, and can't differentiate between rhetoric and non-rhetoric questions.

Slave labor gets people killed, has been since forever. When it isn't forced labor/slave labor, you would get fired and that would be it and when you are allowed to leave a camp, it would not be a forced labor camp anymore, duh.