“Murderer! Worthless Piece of Trash!” – Trump Supporters Line the Streets in New Jersey to Tell Joe Biden What They Think of Him

Joe Biden traveled to Manville, New Jersey on Tuesday to deliver remarks on ‘climate change’ after Hurricane Ida’s remnants caused flooding last week.

81-million vote recipient Joe Biden arrived to New Jersey to a line of Trump supporters.

Biden doesn’t even have support in the ‘blue’ state of New Jersey.

But he totally got 81 million votes.

Trump supporters shouted at Joe Biden as his motorcade drove by in Manville, New Jersey.

Harsh language warning on all videos

“Fuk you Joe Biden. Fuk you, Motherfuer. Leave our soldiers and Americans behind. Piece of sht. Bastard. Fuk you, Biden!”

Gotta love these patriots!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/murderer-worthless-piece-trash-trump-supporters-line-streets-new-jersey-tell-joe-biden-think-video/

How Facebook Undermines Privacy Protections for Its 2 Billion WhatsApp Users

WhatsApp assures users that no one can see their messages — but the company has an extensive monitoring operation and regularly shares personal information with prosecutors.

When Mark Zuckerberg unveiled a new “privacy-focused vision” for Facebook in March 2019, he cited the company’s global messaging service, WhatsApp, as a model. Acknowledging that “we don’t currently have a strong reputation for building privacy protective services,” the Facebook CEO wrote that “I believe the future of communication will increasingly shift to private, encrypted services where people can be confident what they say to each other stays secure and their messages and content won’t stick around forever. This is the future I hope we will help bring about. We plan to build this the way we’ve developed WhatsApp.”

Zuckerberg’s vision centered on WhatsApp’s signature feature, which he said the company was planning to apply to Instagram and Facebook Messenger: end-to-end encryption, which converts all messages into an unreadable format that is only unlocked when they reach their intended destinations. WhatsApp messages are so secure, he said, that nobody else — not even the company — can read a word. As Zuckerberg had put it earlier, in testimony to the U.S. Senate in 2018, “We don’t see any of the content in WhatsApp.”

Get Our Top Investigations

Subscribe to the Big Story newsletter.

Email address:

WhatsApp emphasizes this point so consistently that a flag with a similar assurance automatically appears on-screen before users send messages: “No one outside of this chat, not even WhatsApp, can read or listen to them.”

Those assurances are not true. WhatsApp has more than 1,000 contract workers filling floors of office buildings in Austin, Texas, Dublin and Singapore, where they examine millions of pieces of users’ content. Seated at computers in pods organized by work assignments, these hourly workers use special Facebook software to sift through streams of private messages, images and videos that have been reported by WhatsApp users as improper and then screened by the company’s artificial intelligence systems. These contractors pass judgment on whatever flashes on their screen — claims of everything from fraud or spam to child porn and potential terrorist plotting — typically in less than a minute.

Policing users while assuring them that their privacy is sacrosanct makes for an awkward mission at WhatsApp. A 49-slide internal company marketing presentation from December, obtained by ProPublica, emphasizes the “fierce” promotion of WhatsApp’s “privacy narrative.” It compares its “brand character” to “the Immigrant Mother” and displays a photo of Malala ​​Yousafzai, who survived a shooting by the Taliban and became a Nobel Peace Prize winner, in a slide titled “Brand tone parameters.” The presentation does not mention the company’s content moderation efforts.

WhatsApp’s director of communications, Carl Woog, acknowledged that teams of contractors in Austin and elsewhere review WhatsApp messages to identify and remove “the worst” abusers. But Woog told ProPublica that the company does not consider this work to be content moderation, saying: “We actually don’t typically use the term for WhatsApp.” The company declined to make executives available for interviews for this article, but responded to questions with written comments. “WhatsApp is a lifeline for millions of people around the world,” the company said. “The decisions we make around how we build our app are focused around the privacy of our users, maintaining a high degree of reliability and preventing abuse.”

https://www.propublica.org/article/how-facebook-undermines-privacy-protections-for-its-2-billion-whatsapp-users

Vaccine passports for Australians from October, but still no word on opening international borders

The federal government is rolling out vaccine passports for international travel from next month, but there's still no clear indication on when Australia's borders will reopen.

The passports will allow people to prove their vaccination status internationally.

Even though they'll start being issued from October, vaccinated people entering Australia will still need to quarantine for two weeks.

But outbound travel isn't likely to kickstart from then as a result, the federal government has given no clear indication about when it'll open Australia's international borders and ease restrictions on both inbound and outbound travellers.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-08/covid-live-blog-nsw-press-conference-victoria-lockdown/100442154

>>14536810

E. All of the Above

PEDO BUN 7 September 21

Springfield Woman Pleads Guilty to Sex Trafficking a Child

https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdmo/pr/springfield-woman-pleads-guilty-sex-trafficking-child

New York Man Sentenced for Sending Child Pornography to Liberty Man

https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdmo/pr/new-york-man-sentenced-sending-child-pornography-liberty-man

Pittsburgh Man who Produced Images of His Sexual Abuse of Children Sentenced to Nearly 20 Years in Prison

https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdpa/pr/pittsburgh-man-who-produced-images-his-sexual-abuse-children-sentenced-nearly-20-years

Man Pleads Guilty to the Sexual Abuse of a Two-Year-Old and a Seven-Year-Old Child in Order to Produce Images of the Abuse

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/man-pleads-guilty-sexual-abuse-two-year-old-and-seven-year-old-child-order-produce-images

Crownsville Man Sentenced to Six Years in Federal Prison for Possession of Child Pornography

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/crownsville-man-sentenced-six-years-federal-prison-possession-child-pornography

District Heights Man Pleads Guilty to Federal Charges for the Sexual Abuse of a Two-Year-Old and a Seven-Year-Old Child In Order To Produce Images of the Abuse

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/district-heights-man-pleads-guilty-federal-charges-sexual-abuse-two-year-old-and-seven

Rochester Man Pleads Guilty to Producing Child Pornography Via Snapchat

https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/rochester-man-pleads-guilty-producing-child-pornography-snapchat

5 More Arrests Made In South Carolina Online Predator Sting ‘Operation Home Alone’

https://breaking911.com/5-more-arrests-made-in-south-carolina-online-predator-sting-operation-home-alone/

Judge denies majority of Pornhub’s bid to toss child porn suit

A California judge ruled Friday that the majority of a teen’s child pornography and sex-trafficking suit against embattled X-rated purveyor Pornhub can move forward.

The teenager filed suit anonymously under the name Jane Doe in February, alleging that Pornhub and its parent company MindGeek profited off the videos taken of her when she was just 16.

Her ex-boyfriend posted the videos to Pornhub and another MindGeek site, RedTube, in December 2019, with one of the videos featured on the latter site’s front page receiving 30,000 views, her suit said.

MindGeek — which has been sued by dozens of other alleged victims — asked a judge to toss the suit, claiming immunity since it didn’t create or post the video.

California federal Judge Cormac Carney found that the victim sufficiently alleged that MindGeek, in fact, did act as a content creator — a legal distinction that wouldn’t allow it to claim immunity in the case — for a slew of reasons.

The site asks users to fill out surveys about what type of videos they prefer; it allegedly uses “coded language for child pornography to ensure that content is visible to the ‘right fans'”; and the site allegedly tells users how to name their videos in certain ways that “target individuals interested in child pornography,” the ruling says.

For example, the suit claimed that MindGeek’s sites promote underage content with video playlists titled “less than 18,” “the best collection of young boys” and “under-age.”

“The court finds defendants’ conduct, as plaintiff alleges, has materially contributed to the creation of child pornography on its platforms,” Carney’s decision said.

The judge tossed three other claims in the suit for technical reasons while denying “in substantial part” MindGeek’s motion to dismiss.

The teen’s suit also accused the site of being on notice about the rampant issue of child pornography and child sexual exploitation on its pages, even promoting this content and trying to hide the full extent of the problem — since it profits off it.

“We are thrilled with the decision and we are looking forward to moving forward with discovery and hopefully a trial to vindicate the rights of victims of child sex-trafficking,” her lawyer Arun Subramanian told The Post. “There is just an epidemic of images and videos of underage victims being posted to sites like MindGeek’s and that’s what this case is all about.”

Lawyers for MindGeek did not immediately return a request for comment.

MindGeek has been brought to court by others who claim its sites feature countless videos of women being raped and forced into porn without consenting to the release of the videos.

https://nypost.com/2021/09/07/judge-denies-majority-of-pornhub-bid-to-toss-child-porn-suit/

MORE Afghanistan spending: Biden asks Congress for $6.4 billion for ‘full resettlement’ of Afghan refugees

President Joe Biden has asked Congress to fund the transport, screening, and “full resettlement resources” for Afghan refugees airlifted out of Kabul and waiting to go to the US. The operation will cost the taxpayer $6.4 billion.

By the time the last American plane left Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul a week ago, more than 120,000 people had been airlifted out of the Afghan capital. However, fewer than 6,000 of these were American citizens and their families. “The vast majority” were Afghan refugees and Special Immigrant Visa applicants, according to the Pentagon.

These Afghans were shuttled to American military bases around the world to be processed, with some already flown to new lives in the US. However, keeping and transporting these refugees costs money, and Biden on Tuesday revealed the price in a request to Congress: $6.4 billion.

The White House asked Congress to include this sum on a forthcoming continuing resolution – a bill that modifies the previous year’s spending bill to allow the continued functioning of government should debate delay the passage of the following year’s spending legislation.

The $6.4 billion will fund the security and health screening of “tens of thousands” of Afghans at the US’ overseas processing centers, humanitarian assistance for these people, transit costs from the centers to the United States, “along with full resettlement resources and a path to enable them to build successful new lives here,” all as per a White House statement.

Once in the US, these refugees will also be assisted by government-funded NGOs, meaning the true cost to the taxpayer will be higher still. Moreover, Biden’s request only asks Congress to temporarily fund these refugees, and more money could potentially be set aside for them in next year’s budget.

An administration official told reporters the funding will be used to bring some 65,000 Afghans to the US by the end of September, and another 30,000 after that.

Despite the apparently hefty price tag, $6.4 billion is a drop in the ocean compared to the roughly $2.3 trillion the US spent on its two-decade war and occupation in Afghanistan.

https://www.rt.com/usa/534193-biden-afghan-refugees-resettlement-cost/