Net nuetrality is why the rural areas have little or no options for internet service. Small companies are not capable of providing the service requirements maintaining a monopoly for the large corps. and keeping rural Americans offline. Go fuck yourself.
Fuck u and ur net neutrality bullshit. There's a reason Dems all want it. It keeps rural America offline.
You sound like a military aged male who is fleeing his country as a refugee or a man sneaking ur family across a border illegally. Man up anon.
U dumb mother fucker. I literally just gained access to the internet 1.5 yrs ago. I'm in America. The nearest ISP is 7 miles from my house and they couldn't provide service to me until 1.5 yrs ago. Fucking kill yourself u retarded sharia blue shill. There's a reason DEMS and RINOs are pushing net neutrality. The service requirements force companies to provide a certain minimum speed or they can't operate. Unless u have enough customers localized in an area u cannot provide service at all.
BO you literally just responded to a fucking shill and told him to keep up the good work. Wtf?
You're a disengenious piece of faggot shit. Net neutrality forces small businesses out leaving rural America in the dark. There's a reason the GOP repealed it and DEMS/RINOs want it.
Really? I'm the fucking Ret. Army Nurse that has been posting since /pol/.
It was the one that said "we the people" three times in a row. Deciphered as the "we the people" petition site that was down at the time. Q told us to make ourselves heard re: IBOR.
I know what sacrifice is.
From ur own kikepedia page:
>Several civil rights groups, such as the National Urban League, Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH, and League of United Latin American Citizens, also oppose Title II net neutrality regulations,[127] who said that the call to regulate broadband Internet service as a utility would harm minority communities by stifling investment in underserved areas.[128][129]
And
>Computer scientist Bob Kahn[137] has said net neutrality is a slogan that would freeze innovation in the core of the Internet.[117]
And
>According to a letter to FCC commissioners and key congressional leaders sent by 60 major ISP technology suppliers including IBM, Intel, Qualcomm, and Cisco, Title II regulation of the Internet "means that instead of billions of broadband investment driving other sectors of the economy forward, any reduction in this spending will stifle growth across the entire economy. This is not idle speculation or fear mongering…Title II is going to lead to a slowdown, if not a hold, in broadband build out, because if you don't know that you can recover on your investment, you won't make it."[106][139][140][141]
Read the whole page next time. Net neutrality BLOCKS rural Americans from internet access. If it passes I will lose my service because I'm only getting 2 mbps and the minimum under net neutrality is 4-25 mbps. If u have no idea what ur talking about do some research. I'm living through this problem. Because (you) want unlimited data 10% of America has none.
https:// en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality
Debunked? Walk into a fucking ISP out in the country. Ill wait.
You didn't even read ur own article. It's 100% clear u jumped on it solely for the title. It says the large companies had flat investment spending and they included their TV service in the numbers and that 70% of small businesses decreased service/investments in rural areas specifically because of net neutrality rules.
You have a severe problem reading an entire post anon.
>Earlier this year, around 70 smaller companies, most of whom provide fixed wireless in rural areas, asked the FCC to overturn the net-neutrality rules because they created additional legal burdens and scared away potential investors.
>Elizabeth Bowles, who heads a small internet-service provider in central Arkansas called Aristotle, was among the signers. She says that allow the company always complied with the FCC’s hard and fast rules against blocking and discrimination, the company delayed a planned expansion while making sure the company complied with some of the more esoteric requirements of Title II. The plan expansion eventually moved forward, but Bowles worries about the ongoing legal costs required to make sure the company doesn’t accidentally break any rules.
Plus
>Meanwhile, a second group of about 30 small providers signed an open letter to the FCC saying that they'd not faced barriers to investment and arguing that the net neutrality rules actually help smaller companies by discouraging larger providers from acting anti-competitively.
Ergo 70%