Anonymous ID: 09a347 Sept. 8, 2021, 9:06 a.m. No.14540943   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0951 >>0968 >>1130

>>14540853

cd0aaa

Really, who gives a flying fuck whether the media calls us Q followers or Qanons?

 

What does it really matter as long as we are making an impact on consciousness?

 

Why are (((you))) pushing so hard on this and attacking anons so much and instantly resorting to labelling them as losers, shills, glowies, clowns etc?

 

Are (((you))) a gatekeeper?

 

Can (((you))) tolerate discussion that (((you))) don't agree with without resorting to namecalling and abuse?

 

Take a good look at (((yourself))), if (((you))) are actually a real anon, and not here to cause dissension and chaos amongst anons.

 

What have (((you))) contributed to this bread or any other apart from abuse and bad energy?

Anonymous ID: 09a347 Sept. 8, 2021, 9:36 a.m. No.14541161   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1192

>>14541130

>Really, who gives a flying fuck whether the media calls us Q followers or Qanons?

 

>Nobody.

>Yes, Q mentioned but no big deal, really.

>Just a wedge used by shills to disrupt the board, excuse to start messing with the General Image - longtime tradition shattered. >Which is what shills do: undermine board culture to destroy morale and split anons.

 

>Re QANON used by media:

>I compiled 2000 anti-Q articles at a time when it was still unclear who was targeting us in the MSM.

>Was GREAT that msm talked about QANON.

Made it 1000 times easier to compile database of anti-Q articles for 18 months.

 

EXACTLY

cd0aaa is a bully and a shill who shrinks away from providing sauce, and enjoys abusing others

Anonymous ID: 09a347 Sept. 8, 2021, 10:07 a.m. No.14541326   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14541318

>tidy up the ship

>Pretty sure that had to do with the structure of the notables and globals that at the time were changed to be worse than it was before, not to censor (not illegal) posts.

 

Yes, that was my understanding at the time.