following the 9/11 plane v no-plane on last bread, cgi v not cgi etc. all that is downstream i reckon…i got questions
any digs on the origins of the close-up video(s) of planes hitting towers every tv channeled played on the day?
on the assumption that the video was real in real-time, does anyone know the chain of custody of that video feed, and the networking/communications connections? was it hardwired from the camera to where, exactly? who was the cameraman?
yep sounds about right, but my memory of the day is a bit sketchy. i always found it curious that the origins of imagery so monumental in american history is untraceable and no investigation of the origins in the media, almost like it was purposefully allusive. given the quality of the video of the plane hitting the tower, i'd say it was intended to be controversial to keep the focus on something that most psyches would deny…all the while distracting from the bigger picture. and since there would never be a conclusive resolution to the question of whether the video was fake, the distraction would live on. kinda like keeping the laser pointer on exactly where you want people to focus. fuzzy logic proof that its fake.
used to be a higher up in the industry and can tell you the insane ones are the greenies who drive the legislation. to the engineers it's just a cool technical challenge. i saw a concept design for australia that was a massive above ground pipeline network that went into the tasman. all CO2 exhaust streams in the country would be connected to the pipeline and injected into the earth under the sea.
alex jones is like watching pro wrestling and the news at the same time