>>1454535

I don't normally engage with you FE'er, primarily because it SHOULDN'T be posted in A research, or at least NOT in this thread. Maybe if I post an article debunking your BS, you'll STFU. So, here's some sauce for you. By the way, you mentioned Newton earlier, which is funny. It's exactly his third law of physics that makes thirst possible in space/vacuum. For every reaction, there's an equal and opposite reaction(that law doesn't only work when there's air available dumb ass). Now will you finally either STFU, or atleast post something relavent to what we are doing here!

Sauce:

https://www.livescience.com/34475-how-do-space-rockets-work-without-air.html

>>1454609

Right! I don't care if FE'ers want to believe in what they believe, but it is in NOWAY conducive to what we're doing here. If their trying to make people believe, all their doing is pushing people away from their theory. It's in no way conducive to Qresearch, and when Normie's do come here and see that BS, it's not only going to repulse them from the FE BS, but our Qresearch as well. Again, they can believe what they want, but their spamming it HERE is beyond old.

>>1454621

Thank you for fixing baker. We need to redpill any Normie's that come here with facts, not actual conspiracy theories.

>>1454614

Have to agree with the other anons, anon. Would LOVE for all that to be true, but some sauce for that nugget would be nooiice. Hopefully you have some, and just didn't post.

>>1454648

Thanks anon, but I definitely can't take credit for it's creation. Found it REALLY, REALLY, REALLY quick in a duckduckgo IMG search.

>>1454649

Have to agree, anon. Which is exactly why, IMHO, while it was going down Hussein wouldn't back the coup plotters. Even though it would have been in our countries best interest to get rid of him. Especially since we have a base there that contains nukes.

>>1454679

^^^^THIS^^^^ . This anon 1mil % approves this message! Kek

>>1454697

A zipfile inside of an image, anon? Not saying its not possible, but maybe I'm naive to it, and/or missed how to do it. That said, I am pretty sure there's a way to embed/encrypt messages inside of an image. I'm not sure how to, but I know it's possible.

>>1454698

Baker already stated he was going to take out the flatard nonsense in the next bread. Agree with you, 100%!

>>1454736

I would anon, but I'm tablet faggin it at the moment.

>>1454760

The nose 'engines'(thrusters) are for maneuvering in space! You flatearthtards are FM try hards. I already debunked your thrusters in a vacuum BS, at the top of this bread. If your not going to do something conducive to Qresearch go post in some of the flatard boards with people that actually believe your BS. When normies come here and see your tardness, their going to throw the baby out with the bathwater! So that's either your 'plan'(your one of them), or you really are a window licker(having to be told every 5 seconds). Believing in what you do, I'm betting on the later since anyone with 2 braincells can easily debunk your ACTUAL TARD theories.

>>1454772

It'd go back to the same as it was BEFORE net neutrality. Wow, that was hard to figure out, anon. By the way, have you noticed the way libtards have started censoring conservatives EVER SINCE net neutrality was passed? It never happened that way before, at least not anywhere near the extent it's happening now. I'm also not saying net neutrality directly gave them the power to do so, but I feel like it emboldened them enough to start doing so.

>>1454801

Your tardness is showing, anon, you might want to cover that up. Everything I said, was fact. Your spewing 💩. You should find some rope.

>>1454795

I didn't say there wasn't anything embedded, anon. I guess I assumed you seen my previous post. Someone said there wasn't any zipped files embedded(which I honestly didn't know you could do). Since there aren't any zips embedded, there could by an encrypted message, actual text, embedded in the image itself. Again, I also stated earlier I'm actually not sure how that's done either, but I am 100% sure it can be done. Sorry in advance if that didn't come out right. Running on 0% sleep, about time for me to try and hit the hay for at least a couple hours.

>>1454842

The moles were Josef Misfud and… Shit, I can't think of the other guys name. Was from the UK as well, last name starts with a P I believe. It's in a notable in a previous bread. I pointed it out yesterday morning.

I HONESTLY dont think I've ever had a conversation with people as retarded as FE'ers! Even people with actual mental handicaps are able to grasp undeniable facts, but FE'ers apparently can't stop licking windows long enough. They don't understand that their dumb theories will actually make normies flee from Qresearch quicker than probably any other yard theory. I guess someone needs to invent 💩 flavored windows, so they'll stop long enough to actually listen to facts. Until then, I guess the filter is going to be working overtime. I haven't ever filtered anyone, but the crap is getting to deep to wade through. The rest of us are trying to help drain the swamp, and their just 💩'n it up more.

>>1454895

Yeah, that's it anon. Thank you.

>>1454947

Agreed anon, it really is amazing, how it can snatch up some fairly intelligent people. Not many, but some. Those are the ones that can actually be woke since they have reasoning skills. Then there are the ones that believe it DUE TO their mental capacity. Those are the ones that an anon can disprove EVERYTHING they state, and 30 seconds later their posting thee same 💩 an anon just disproved. If it didn't 💩 up breads, filling them up with slide material, it'd almost be funny that someone could believe that hard(which absolutely has to do with the mental capacity).

>>1455041

NO ONE, besides literal flatards are connecting Q's pic with the flatard psyop. How's that window taste? Almost thought I had all you flatards filtered. My headache was going away not having to see the constant barrage of 💩. Not feeling compelled to disprove literal tards(which is EXACTLY like trying to explain physics to a 3 year old, since both have the same mental capacity). I guess shills are gonna shill, and keep people sliding.

>>1455067

Flatards are constantly stating newtons 3rd law, saying it doesn't work in a vacuum. What they don't realize is that all Newton said, is that for every action there's and equal and opposite reaction(which DOESN'T only apply when there's air/matter around). Have pointed this out to plenty of flatards, they stop sliding for about 5 mins, and then they go on to state the exact same thing that was just disproven. I likened them to a 3 year old in a previous post, but just realized, at least a 3 year would probably stop stating the same BS that they just learned to be false. Even a damn monkey is smarter than flatards, they actually learn from their mistakes. I guess a gold comparison would be a……. goldfish? No, maybe not. People actually like gold fish. I know, a SUCKERfish. Kek.