I approve the message presented in this post. The poster is 194th in line as my top hero. There is no homo implied anywhere in this post. Love ya anyway, you faggot (no homo).
Doesn't matter how the Senate voted on NN. The House isn't gonna bring it to the floor, so it's dead. What is now will stand.
I don't trust Turkey. I certainly don't trust Erdogan. I don't like them being in NATO. The best thing about turkey is being stuffed and baked, served with mashed potatoes at Thanksgiving, when we give thanks for overthrowing those fuckin' Turks! Other than that, I guess they're alright, if they weren't fuckin' Turks.
I haven't read about anybody in history that has ever trusted the Turks and lived to tell about it.
OMG, I forgot all about that dick……thanks for the reminder, you prick!…:)
I'm gonna be honest.
I don't fully understand what are the perils on net neutrallty or abandoning it.
I've heard that abandoning it will stop FB, Twitshit, etc from being able to shadowban conservative voices, etc.
What's the truth?
Yep, I understand that. I agree, I haven't seen a difference but I don't do FB and Twitter so maybe it doesn't or won't affect me. And I'm aware that the House isn't gonna deal with it so whatever the Senate just did is meaningless
What'd he say?….."Don't star discussions or listen or to people…."
"Else why would anyone care who talked to with?"
I'm drunk, but I'm not THAT drunk to realize…that's some fucked up speakin' right there. Your intellect quotient is close to zero, you flat earth acid head. What's wrong with you? You ain't normal.
I think the entire nation of Turkey is a deep state. If Erdogan goes, the next bastard will come in and the same game is playing. I say, take 'em out and give the land to the Kurds.
That may well be. I don't know; I'm not an expert on Middle East affairs. The way it stands now, I don't trust the Turks as far as the power structure goes. I feel the Kurds have proven themselves to be strong fighters and fighting for good so, give the land to them and let's see how it goes. Again, the power structure in Turkey right now is not to be trusted, IMO. If it's the cabal controlling it, then that's a battle we're fighting right now. Whatever the case may be, Turkey is very sketchey, IMO.
What the hell?…Canada just sucks more and more, each day. I think we need a southern border wall AND a northern border wall. Gayman Trudeau is not a good neighbor.
What? No spheres on flat earth? No balls, marbles, round turds? They look like spheres but that's an optical illusion, right? Tomorrow is gonna be fun getting my neighbors dog to chase a flat panel. Stupid dog is gonna think it's a ball…..KEK
What causes the ebb and flow of tides on your flat earth?
Yikes….my apologies. I do know sarcarsm but I certainly misinterpreted yours. My bad. I suck. I'm gonna punish myself by forcing down a beer at 8:00 in the morning. If that don't teach me, nothing will.
How do you know there is a lack of molecules in space? Where did you get this information? Certainly you, or someone, would need to be in space to get this info. What source are you using for this info?
Doesn't answer my question. FE state a rocket can't thrust in space because of no molecules. I'm asking, who has proven there are no molecules in space? "Scientists" is not a valid answer. What is the name of the "people" that went into space and discovered there were no molecules? NASA? Elon Musk? Copernicus and his magic space balloon? Who? What is the name of the source that is the basis of your "facts"?
I am not kidding. You are just saying words. I asked for the source of your alleged facts. You have provided none. I can say there are purple monkeys flying all around the moon. Should I expect that you take that as fact? You are saying blah blah blah but don't provide a named source for this info. I'm not disputing you; I'm asking for your distinct sources of your "facts" and you are providing none.
Well, let me tell you, little girl. You, again have provided no sources. But I know the source of all the information. It comes from NASA because they have been in space and have provided this info. The flat earthers will certainly use NASA facts when it serves their narrative (no molecules in spaces, etc.) but when NASA proves that there can be thrust in space because they have done it, the FE retards spit and sputter and say no, no, no……because it doesn't serve their phony narrative. You're a fake trying to sell a stupid ridiculous fallacy.
Amazing! We question everything, EVERYTHING that society, government, culture, etc does, and rightfully so. That is a must thing that we must do…..and yet, we tend to accept everything "science" tells us as God's truth……"Yessir Mr Doody! Come right in, Mr. Doody!"……….I don't get it. What's up with that?