The last 3 sentences were to show u the 30 making a total of 100 companies. The ACLU is a PROGRESSIVE org anon. Like I said, DEMs and RINOs are pushing NN. Did u notice how the article ends with an opinion and that's the only thing supporting the title? Either ur sincerely confused and took the name "net neutrality" at face value or ur intentionally shilling for Dems. I hope it's the former.
And then I just saw ur last post about "muh Dems". Smdh.
Now can everyone see that Net Neutrality is a Dem/Shill op?
Last (you) you're getting from (me).
Flynn was working with Turkey at that timeframe. Food for thought.
It's only flat on the outside.
>1454672
I said (you) weren't getting anymore (you)s from me. But for other anons on the fence notice who supported Net Neutrality:
Senator Al Franken
Progressive Change Campaign Committee
Ford Foundation
Demand Progress
And then there's this paragraph:
>After President Barack Obama publicly endorsed utility-style regulation of broadband in November, Organizing for Action, the group spun off from his re-election campaign, blasted a statement to supporters touting the news — and included a donation link. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which raises money for House Democrats, did the same.
Tl;dr
It was another way to funnel campaign funds for Obama and several progressive political action groups.
https:// www.politico.com/story/2015/02/net-neutrality-a-lobbying-bonanza-115385
>muh Dems saved us
Also
>gas the kikes
Ok (you) get one last (you) simply so I can point out how Dems are trying to poison the well on this board. Congrats. I'm sure Obama is proud of (you).
>1454751
And rightfully so. AT&T still doesn't provide service to my area despite me living 1/4 mile from the tower. Only decent cell service we get here is AT&T (5 bars actually; all others were 1-3) but I can't get Internet from them. Mother in law lives 1/2 mile from me and has access to both satellite & cable internet from AT&T. (You) know why they won't expand down my way? Net mother fucking Neutrality caused them to shelf their plans for expansion. Literally 1/4 mile from my house. Neighbors have unlimited high speed internet and all I can access is 25gigs/month DSL at 2mbps (which I've only been able to get recently). Q has almost been here longer than I've had access to the net from my home.
Well net neutrality has been repealed for a year or so now. Notice anything different? Nope. The fear mongering Dems are BTFO.
>1454804
Literally no you dumbfuck. I've conversed with the actual workers and companies over the past 5 years. I know factually what has occured. Only a brainlet would call me citing facts as "propaganda". I learned what was going on well before I ever clicked on a link or heard a politician speak about it the idea of starting Net Neutrality.
Sure sounded great in theory at first even despite GOP being against it. Until it actually went through and everything stopped. That's when I said wait a minute I was promised great things from "muh gubernment". Why dey lie?
Problem is regulating the internet as a public utility. That's literally the only problem and it kills everything. Because of that there are stringent guidelines on minimum speed an thus many low populated areas cannot support an ISP due to the cost of regulations and equipment. Go ahead and explain ur way around that schlmo.
It literally comes down to access in underdeveloped areas i.e. low population. The cost to service a small community is too great for a small company (due to regulatory fees and equipment requirements) and simply not worth it for a large one (cost per unit not worth investment because they have shareholders to please). Without the public utility designation small companies can provide service albeit at slower speeds. Something is better than nothing. Fuck in Iraq we only had 15 kbps but I was sure happy to have that rather than nothing at all.
The very same people that say rockets work in space say space is a vacuum. Anon is stating that both can't be true. If one is not true which one is it? Or is it both? If one or both are not true then wtf is going on with the area we know as "outer space" ?
Kys
I wasn't holding the convo only translating the aspect that 1 anon was grilling the other anon over. As far as it having nothing to do with Q drops they dropped a pic of a space shuttle last night. Anon presented a video showing the space shuttle flying like a jet. Then the convo started re: NASA lying about/distorting space shuttle tech. While normally I would agree this is inconsequential to what we're doing it is literally directly related to the convo that has gone on for several hours now. Granted I personally have no interest in said discourse but I would like to thank u for the explaination re: rocket propulsion.