Anonymous ID: e0ecef Sept. 9, 2021, 8:01 a.m. No.14546120   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6154

>>14546089

Not in NK. Just read an article about Kim Jong Un's weight, that mentions they've had zero cases of "Covid."

They did have to throw in at the end, that there was a change up in his administration due to Covid, but didn't elaborate.

Probably got rid of some asswipe that wanted to spread the rumors of the virus there.

 

Kim's looking Strong and HAPPY

 

Business Insider

Photos from North Korea suggest Kim Jong Un's weight loss had continued in the wake of rumored health scares

https://www.yahoo.com/news/photos-north-korea-suggest-kim-115131728.html

Anonymous ID: e0ecef Sept. 9, 2021, 8:25 a.m. No.14546234   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6251

>>14546213

>>14546221

Dont forget

 

777

 

>>388528

Why is Big Pharma essential?

Expand your thinking past cures.

Think Google [new Pixel phone].

Think Apple [vs. Samsung].

Why was Blackberry destroyed?

We can guide but you must organically uncover the TRUTH.

THEY are watching.

ARCHIVE EVERYTHING OFFLINE.

Q

 

>>388588

Why is everything 'really' made in China?

Cost savings?

Why is POTUS focused on SA/CHINA/RUSSIA?

WHY???????????

WHY IS RUSSIA BEING USED AGAINST POTUS?

WHY RUSSIA?

WHAT DAMAGE CAN RUSSIA DO TO DEMS?

WHAT DAMAGE CAN CHINA DO TO DEMS?

IRAN?

NK?

WHY DOES HUSSEIN TRAVEL BEFORE/AFTER POTUS RE: FOREIGN TRIPS?

USE LOGIC.

WHY IS POTUS FOCUSED ON BRINGING BACK MANUFACTURING?

JOBS?

SECURITY?

CONTROL?

TRUE CONTROL?

WHO CAN YOU TRUST?

THE WORLD IS NOT HOW YOU VIEW IT.

TRUST THE PLAN.

WE ARE WINNING.

ARRESTS WILL COME.

LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.

LEARN AND SPREAD.

BUILD PROOFS.

WE'VE PROVIDED MANY PROOFS THAT CANNOT BE DISPUTED AS COINCIDENCES.

THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON.

MORE WILL BE PROVIDED.

DIRECT CONFIRMATION WILL COME.

IT CANNOT COME NOW.

IT WILL BE LOST.

THE MESSAGE IS NOT READY.

YOU ARE PART OF THE ARMY.

WE ARE DEPENDING ON YOU.

FOR GOD & COUNTRY.

WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.

STAY SAFE THIS WEEK.

Q

Anonymous ID: e0ecef Sept. 9, 2021, 8:52 a.m. No.14546377   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>14546327

CD 34?

 

3.4 WHEN JUS IN BELLO RULES APPLY

Jus in bello treaties often provide that they apply in cases of “declared war or of any

other armed conflict,” even if the state of war is not recognized by them.43 This standard has

also been understood to result in the application of the customary law of war.44

A case of “declared war or any other armed conflict” for the purpose of determining

whether parties must comply with jus in bello rules may be understood as arising in two ways:

(1) when a party intends to conduct hostilities; or (2) when parties are actually conducting

hostilities.

“War,” “hostilities,” and “armed conflict” may be defined differently for other legal

purposes.

45 It must be emphasized that the discussion in this section is for the purpose of

assessing whether jus in bello restrictions apply and not necessarily for other purposes. For

example, the fact that jus in bello restrictions apply is not determinative of whether a State’s

actions are lawful under jus ad bellum.

46 Similarly, the fact that jus in bello restrictions apply is

not determinative of whether the permissions that are sometimes viewed as inherent in jus in

bello rules may be relied upon by a State or non-State actor.47

 

https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190