More commie garbage from AP.
> California also uses paper ballots, which makes it easier to verify results.
No mention of printing ballots at home.
>But Stark said the sheer number of people who now have access to the information makes this breach especially serious. While it’s possible the information already was in the hands of the Russians or other adversaries, there had been considerable expense and legwork involved in getting it, he said. Now that’s not the case.
Clown. Anyone who's been paying attention to electronic voting knows that transparency of the operating system/software is paramount to election security. There should be no secrets in election software, and I'm pretty sure that's why ESS systems was bared from selling voting equipement.
Real election security experts have suggested in the past that voting software be put in escrow in case of audit so it can be reviewed fully for flaws and security.
Making dominon's software public has provided transparency that was desperately needed.