Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:24 p.m. No.14548280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8308 >>8383 >>8489 >>8502 >>8551 >>8600 >>8610 >>8620 >>8635 >>8645 >>8650

all PB

 

>>14547972 all this worldwide 9/11 MK PROGRAMMING shit began @0.06 with a SOUND no accident it is captured at 6 Mark

 

 

>>14547983 freeze/pause vid @ 0.37 compare

>>14548101 compare smile lines around eyes, mouth, teeth, nose, eyes and swath of hair area Hi Todd! Welcome Back!

 

 

All PB

>>14547972

>>14547983

>>14547995

>>14548002

>>14548014

>>14548030

>>14548080

>>14548101

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:33 p.m. No.14548383   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8422

>>14548280

>>14548308

 

freeze/pause vid @ 0.37 compare

 

compare smile lines around eyes, mouth, teeth, nose, eyes and swath of hair area

 

 

Hi Todd! Welcome Back!

 

Let's Roll

all of the fuckers

with the golden tickets

and fill them all with LEAD

on camera

film it

and paste all over the TV

for the world to see

 

 

now that is the snuff film we all want to witness

payback for the 9/11 snuff film they made us all watch

 

 

hey MSM lurker fags

 

take a poll

 

PB

>>14547972 ) all this worldwide 9/11 MK PROGRAMMING shit began @0.06 with a SOUND no accident it is captured at 6 Mark

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:43 p.m. No.14548489   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8502 >>8551 >>8600 >>8610 >>8620 >>8635 >>8645 >>8650

>>14548407

 

LB

>>14547972

 

read and look at the images

 

CIA Pilot Presents Evidence That No Planes Hit Towers On 9/11

Ex-CIA and commercial jet pilot John Lear claims that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11, and now detailed information has been posted online corroborating his account.

The grandson of Learjet founder Bill Lear, John Lear is a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot who has flown over 100 different types of plane during 40 years of active flying. He holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certified pilot, and has flown secret CIA missions in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

Basically, you don’t want to argue with John Lear about flying and planes. He is as close as you can come to being American intelligence and aerospace aristocracy.

 

https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

>>14548280

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:50 p.m. No.14548551   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8600 >>8610 >>8620 >>8635 >>8645 >>8650 >>8688 >>8701 >>8727

 

kek (this image and commentary from article next to other plane wreck images and debris and Shanksville hole in ground zero debris:)

 

 

The ground swallowed Flight 93 that day.

The plane, it's remianing 5,500 gallons of fuel,

every passenger,

all their belongings,

every chair,

drink cart,

window,

door, panel and screw.

 

So, don't fucking ask again.

 

 

https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

 

>>14548502

>>14548489

>>14548407

>>14548280

>>14548308

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:56 p.m. No.14548600   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8610 >>8620 >>8635 >>8645 >>8650 >>8688 >>8701 >>8727

PLEASE go to the article and see the images

it will help YOU see the truth

 

https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

>>14548551

>>14548502

>>14548489

>>14548407

>>14548280

>>14548308

 

CIA Pilot Presents Evidence That No Planes Hit Towers On 9/11

July 22, 2016 Baxter Dmitry News, US 28 Comments

 

Ex-CIA and commercial jet pilot John Lear claims that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11, and now detailed information has been posted online corroborating his account.

In Lear’s expert opinion the official claim that two planes crashed into the towers is actually “physically impossible.”

 

The grandson of Learjet founder Bill Lear, John Lear is a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot who has flown over 100 different types of plane during 40 years of active flying. He holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certified pilot, and has flown secret CIA missions in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

 

Basically, you don’t want to argue with John Lear about flying and planes. He is as close as you can come to being American intelligence and aerospace aristocracy.

9/11 Plane Hoax explains his theories:

 

THE EVIDENCE THAT NO REAL PLANES WERE USED ON 9/11

 

We are supposed to believe that both planes were entirely inside the towers, with no pieces showing. A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide and 159 feet long. The distance from: the outer perimeter of the North Tower at the alleged point of contact by AA Flight 11, to: the central 47 massive inner core beams that are cross-braced is 60 feet. The distance from: the outer surface of the South Tower at the alleged point of contact by UA Flight 175, to: the core structure of that building was 37 feet. The differential in length in relation to the North Tower with respect to plane length and a building length that is measured in terms of the distance to the core structure is about 99 feet. The differential length for the South Tower is approximately 122 feet. A 767 is 159 feet long so most of the plane has got to be outside of the tower in both cases since there is simply no room for the entire length of the plane to crumple into. Why didn’t we see 99 feet of AA Flight 11 sticking out of the North Tower or broken off, crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the ground below? Why didn’t we see 122 feet of UA Flight 175 sticking out of the South Tower or crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the WTC plaza below?

 

There is no plane or plane wreckage at all to be seen in the hole of either tower in any video or photos.

Of course, as per Lear’s theory, there are no planes to be seen in the holes of either tower or on the street below because there were no real planes.

 

We would expect a sharp deceleration as the plane crumpled to fit into the 60 feet of space (North Tower, Flight 11) and 35 feet of space (South Tower, Flight 175) from the perimeter to the central steel core. Instead, in the videos, both planes enter the towers entirely at uniform motion.

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:57 p.m. No.14548610   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8616 >>8620 >>8635 >>8645 >>8650

>>14548600

 

>>14548551

>>14548502

>>14548489

>>14548407

>>14548280

>>14548308

 

cont: https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

THE PLANE DOES NOT FIT

A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide. The width of the hole in the South Tower was 106 feet wide and the width of the hole in the North Tower was 125 feet wide. 50 feet of the Boeing 767 that allegedly struck the South Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. 31 feet of the Boeing 767 that is said to have hit the North Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. Some people may say that the wings of the Boeings merely folded back as the aluminum portion of the wings came in contact with the exterior steel columns. However we can see this is not what happens in the videos. Even so the aluminum wings would not neatly fold back they would be torn off.

TORSION

Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” High school physics states that the force an airplane exerts on a building is the same as the force a building exerts on an airplane. Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower. Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fibreglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.

The above diagram shows that Flight 175 was intersecting with eight (8) floors that consisted of steel trusses connected at one end to the core columns and to the external support columns at the other, where each floor was covered with 4-8” of concrete, representing an acre of concrete apiece and posing enormous horizontal resistance to any airplane’s penetration into the building.

 

In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower there is no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. This is impossible. It is cartoon physics. It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter. A passenger jet is a hollow aluminum and plastic tube which is highly vulnerable to impacts with flying birds. The “plane” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.

 

From the holes left in both towers after “impact” we are supposed to believe the wings sliced clean through the 14 inch steel beams but this is simply impossible. The fragile mostly hollow aluminum wings would not slice through all the 14 inch steel box columns of the WTC towers and leave a Wylie Coyote style hole. An airplane wing can be sliced in half by a wooden telephone pole:

Aluminum plane wings will not cut through 14 inch steel regardless of speed and weight. Not only is it impossible for the wings to have cut through the steel columns but it is absolutely impossible for the fragile wing tips to have also cut through the steel columns.

The wings would break off immediately upon contact and the plane would explode. It would not enter the tower and then explode. The plane would simply be obliterated to pieces by the 14 inch steel box columns and the steel and concrete floor trusses before it got anywhere near the inside of the tower.

Newton’s First Law of Motion: “A body remains at rest or in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.” The plane did not slow down as it made contact with the tower. How can the plane fly at the same speed through the steel/concrete face of the tower as it did through the air? This is impossible. The “plane” also violates Newton’s First Law.

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:58 p.m. No.14548620   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8635 >>8645 >>8650

>>14548610

 

>>14548600

>>14548551

>>14548502

>>14548489

>>14548407

>>14548280

>>14548308

 

cont:https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

THERE ARE NO VERIFIED AIRPLANE PARTS

 

Apart from one or two props placed there like a bit of tire and a bit of engine…parts that didn’t even match a Boeing 767 and like the laughable bit of engine on the Pentagon lawn there were no real plane parts or debris to be seen and no black boxes were ever found at ground zero. In reality, if a plane had hit the tower it would have crushed up like a car hitting a wall and its wings would have broken off and the majority of the plane would have fallen to the street below. The street below would have been littered with plane debris and the charred remains of the passengers yet it wasn’t because there was no plane.

 

NO OFFICIAL CRASH REPORTS

 

FAA Regulation 121 requires a comprehensive investigation of all crashes of scheduled commercial flights yet there are no official crash reports on the 4 incidents because there were no planes.

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 2:59 p.m. No.14548635   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14548620

 

>>14548610

>>14548600

>>14548551

>>14548502

>>14548489

>>14548407

>>14548280

>>14548308

 

cont: https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

“THE AIRCRAFT WOULD LITERALLY FALL OUT OF THE SKY”

 

Experienced commercial and military pilots have stated that the speed and manoeuvres of the planes that hit the World Trade Center are impossible to have happened. They state they could not replicate the alleged flights themselves. Two experienced pilots using flight simulators on the morning of 9/11 could not hit towers at 500 mph in six attempts. In reality a 767 fly can not fly that fast at sea level. Pilots For 9/11 Truth state that the speed and sharp manoeuvres would have resulted in the plane breaking up from the stress on the aircraft frame due to the the speed and air pressure. It would be extremely difficult for the pilot to actually hit the tower even if the wings didn’t break off due to the stress.

Capt. Russ Wittenberg is a former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Retired commercial pilot. Flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years. Aircraft flown: Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. 30,000+ total hours flown. Capt. Russ Wittenberg is a unique individual in that he had previously flown the actual two United Airlines aircraft Flight 93 and Flight 175.

 

This is what he has to say:

 

Video interview 9/11 Ripple Effect 8/07:

 

“I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.

 

I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it’s design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s.

 

And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”

 

Article 7/17/05:

 

“The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple.” … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have “descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon’s first floor wall without touching the lawn.”…

 

“I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.

 

I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it’s design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”

 

“For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible – there is not one chance in a thousand,” said Wittenberg, recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727’s to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737’s through 767’s it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying.

 

“The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall.

 

The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous…

 

It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building.

 

There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile.”

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 3:01 p.m. No.14548645   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8650 >>8660

>>14548620

 

>>14548610

>>14548600

>>14548551

>>14548502

>>14548489

>>14548407

>>14548280

>>14548308

 

cont: https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

“PLANES” HAVE A CGI APPEARANCE

 

In all of the footage the alleged planes hitting the twin towers clearly do not look real. The planes have a computer generated appearance. In the different footage we see the planes changing shape and color, missing wings, are featureless and blurred. Pilot John Lear made the observation that the plane has no strobe lights. The plane also casts no shadow.

NO RECORD OF FLIGHTS TAKING OFF

 

According to BTS statistics, both 11 and 77 officially never took-off on 9/11. The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the country also showed no elapsed run-way time, wheels-off time and taxi-out time, not to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the two flights.

 

Although flights 11 and 77 have the above data meticulously logged on 9/10, it was suspiciously absent on 9/11, even when every other plane that took of that day had been recorded and logged by the BTS. The flight that was labelled flight 11 by air traffic control was 10 miles from Manhattan at 8:46am. If flights AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then there are only two planes, not four, to be accounted for. Investigators who have checked the tail numbers for the planes which departed as UA 93 and UA 175 on 9/11 (namely N591UA and N612UA respectively) believe that these planes are still in service. If so, and if AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then the number of Boeing 757s and 767s destroyed on 9/11 was not four, as the US government maintains, but rather zero.

 

Both UA 175, plane number N612UA and UA 93, plane number N591UA, were “still registered and valid more than 4 years after [their] alleged destruction.

 

Pilots For 9/11 Truth, have confirmed that United 175 received a message at least twenty minutes after it allegedly crashed into the World Trade Center. This proves that the flight never smashed into the Center but instead flew for some time that day, a point advanced in the book ‘Planes Without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11’.

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 3:01 p.m. No.14548650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8670

>>14548645

 

>>14548620

>>14548610

>>14548600

>>14548551

>>14548502

>>14548489

>>14548407

>>14548280

>>14548308

 

cont: https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

NO PLANES ANYWHERE

 

Most people in the 9/11 Truth community accept that no planes were used at the Pentagon and Shanksville; the evidence shows no real planes were used for the towers either.

In conclusion we can be 100% certain the planes were not real. Apart from defying the laws of physics with impossible crash dynamics the planes do not even look real. The question is: are the planes digital composites (CGI) inserted into real video or is it a 3D projected image using advanced technology not known to the public? Richard D Hall’s 3D radar data analysis has confirmed that the trajectory of the “planes” in all the videos match up with the radar data. If video fakery was used i.e the planes were digital composites, the question can be asked why would they go to the trouble of making sure all the “plane” videos match up with the radar data but do such a poor job of rendering the planes which look like poor quality CGI, Why does the wing momentarily disappear in six different videos? This is a still from the Hezarkhani video showing a digital composite plane on the top and the original “plane” from the Hezarkhani video underneath: http://imageshack.com/a/img198/7545/n16q.jpg The digital composite plane looks more realistic. Here is a video showing how easy it is to create a digital composite plane and insert it into real video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds Here is another example of a digital composite plane inserted into the Evan Fairbanks video: http://imageshack.com/a/img834/7263/qsm.gif Why would they create such poor quality CGI planes that look different in different videos? If the planes were a digital composite it should look the same in every video. Based on Richard D Hall’s radar data analysis (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5DgFcpsxes), the witness testimony and the fact the left wing disappears in 4 videos and the right wing in 2 videos the evidence points to the plane being a 3D projection. Richard D Hall believes there may have been a solid object, probably a small missile at the centre of the “illusion”, with an image of a Boeing 767 being projected around it.

 

ADVANCED HOLOGRAM TECHNOLOGY?

 

The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator. The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management. It is also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary.”

 

This technology was reported in the media before 9/11 pertaining to military psychological operations (PSYOPS).

 

Washington Post

 

“When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing”

 

By William M. Arkin

 

February 1, 1999

 

A few notable quotes (emphasis added):

 

According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air.

 

…washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The “Holographic Projector” is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to “project information power from space … for special operations deception missions.”

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 3:07 p.m. No.14548688   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8701 >>8719 >>8727 >>8808

>>14548308

>>14548600

>>14548551

 

go read the article and see al the images and the diagrams

 

cont: https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

 

The above diagram shows that Flight 175 was intersecting with eight (8) floors that consisted of steel trusses connected at one end to the core columns and to the external support columns at the other, where each floor was covered with 4-8” of concrete, representing an acre of concrete apiece and posing enormous horizontal resistance to any airplane’s penetration into the building.

 

In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower there is no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. This is impossible. It is cartoon physics. It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter. A passenger jet is a hollow aluminum and plastic tube which is highly vulnerable to impacts with flying birds. The “plane” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.

 

From the holes left in both towers after “impact” we are supposed to believe the wings sliced clean through the 14 inch steel beams but this is simply impossible. The fragile mostly hollow aluminum wings would not slice through all the 14 inch steel box columns of the WTC towers and leave a Wylie Coyote style hole. An airplane wing can be sliced in half by a wooden telephone pole:

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 3:14 p.m. No.14548759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8801

>>14548225

see the vaxx has fucked you up

proof as you have lost function of fingers already

you are unable to turn off all caps

and now function while typing like a spaz tourettes guy

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 3:23 p.m. No.14548851   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8870 >>8899

>>14548777

YOU are freaking out because the vaxx you took is deigned to make you even more irrational nad insane than you were prior to the jabb

you posts are symptoms the jab worked as designed

expect to become more upset and irrational

Anonymous ID: b9f0aa Sept. 9, 2021, 3:28 p.m. No.14548903   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14548737

just use space bar and miove your post/the text you are writing and the link to any other psot if you include any so all is moved down a line or two

the system will not read it as a flood or that you are psoting often

 

use your space bar and drop it al ldown before you hit new reply