Anonymous ID: 01c7f2 Sept. 9, 2021, 5:01 p.m. No.14549621   🗄️.is 🔗kun

CDC Bases Covid Jab Death Toll % on Doses – Not People, as Death Toll Topples all Other “Vaccines” for 3 Decades

 

For over 18 months Corey’s Digs has been reporting on the CDC’s inconsistencies, manipulated numbers, falsehoods, and blatant lies. Not only did the CDC bury influenza deaths under the guise of Covid, they also lumped pneumonia deaths with Covid, in addition to documenting anyone who died WITH Covid who was in a car accident, had a gunshot wound, kidney failure, or other life-threatening diseases, as a Covid death. Now, they are basing the percentage of jab-related Covid deaths on the number of doses administered rather than the number of people who received the jabs – an incredible mathematical error, surely done with intention.

 

In this article, it exposes how the CDC is once again manipulating minds by manipulating death toll numbers from the Covid jab. It also shows discrepancies in efficacy, and an alarming chart comparison to other jabs with reported deaths over the past three decades, which should raise a red flag for everyone.

 

Most people are fully aware that the CDC’s VAERS reporting system has lacked in reporting over the years, so it’s fairly safe to say that the death toll after receiving a Covid jab is under-documented to begin with. Furthermore, the CDC and HHS went above and beyond to document all death certificates into their database to escalate the number of people who died WITH Covid, not FROM Covid. Yet, they don’t seem to be documenting death certificates of those who died after receiving the Covid jab. The only “reporting” seems to be running through their VAERS system.

 

That said, here is a perfect and yet very simple example of how the CDC manipulates numbers directly on their website, assuming that the average person isn’t going to bother to do the math. The mainstream news, whose so-called journalists also won’t do the math, then take the information and spin it out to meet their narrative, much in the way they recently did with the FDA’s bait-and-switch on the Pfizer Covid jab’s so-called approval.

CDC Intentionally Decreases the Overall Percentage of Reported Deaths After Receiving Covid Jab

 

The CDC reported that the death toll on the VAERS reporting system indicates 6,968 deaths as of August 18, 2021. Next to the death toll they point out that the 6,968 deaths amount to (0.0019%) “among people who received a Covid-19 vaccine.” This is a totally false statement. They are basing it on the number of jabs administered, when most people have already received BOTH jabs. They indicate that 363 million doses have been administered. The population of the U.S. is only 328.2 million, therefore millions of people have received two doses. They are using the 363 million “doses” to establish the 0.0019%, which is NOT “among people,” but rather “doses,” and ultimately reduces the percentage by nearly half. This is done for perception, because percentages have a greater impact on a person’s mind.

 

Note that they state “reports of death after Covid-19 vaccination are rare.” Yes, perhaps the “reports” are rare because many are not even being reported, but the alarming death toll itself is even rarer, and they are downplaying it.

 

On a separate CDC page from the last week of August (it’s updated weekly), one can find the overall breakdown of how many people have received the jab, whether it be one dose or two. This is a critical number that plays into their incorrect math. A total of 203 million PEOPLE have received the jab, which is a considerably lower number than 363 million DOSES.

 

https://www.coreysdigs.com/health-science/cdc-bases-covid-jab-death-toll-on-doses-not-people-as-death-toll-topples-all-other-vaccines-for-3-decades/

Anonymous ID: 01c7f2 Sept. 9, 2021, 5:04 p.m. No.14549644   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Obama Judge Ignores and then Throws Out Attorney Sidney Powell’s Trump 2020 Election Case in Michigan – Now Assessing Powell Fine of $200,000 for Filing Case

 

Obama judge is an oxymoron always.

 

An Obama Judge ignored Trump’s case from the 2020 Election raised by attorney Sidney Powell and then U.S. District Judge Linda V. Parker threw the case out in December. The judge’s opinion was a disgrace and it’s likely she didn’t even review the data from Powell supplied in the case. Quite honestly, Obama Judge Parker couldn’t have reviewed Powell’s support to come up with her judgment.

 

Next, the far-left Obama judge ordered attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood be punished for raising the case she threw out.

 

Today it’s being reported that Powell was fined $200,000 for having the audacity to claim the 2020 Election was corrupted in Michigan. Obama Judge Parker knows all.

 

According to the Daily Mail today:

 

Michigan officials are demanding more than $200,000 in legal fees from pro-Trump lawyers led by Sidney Powell who unsuccessfully tried to overturn the 2020 election result with a lawsuit dismissed as full of conspiracies, it emerged on Thursday.

 

Last month, U.S. District Judge Linda Parker ruled that state and local election officials could claim reimbursement of their legal fees.

 

The judge will now review the $200,000 in requests submitted to the court on Wednesday.

 

Obama wanted change and he got it. His judges are outrageously biased and corrupt. His foreign policies are blowing the world up while providing arms to terrorists. His economic policies are destroying the economy.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/obama-judge-ignores-throws-attorney-sidney-powells-trump-2020-election-case-michigan-now-fines-powell-200000-filing-case/

Anonymous ID: 01c7f2 Sept. 9, 2021, 5:09 p.m. No.14549687   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Company controlled by one of Singapore's richest families legally pocketed $5.4m in JobKeeper despite lifting profits

 

A private company controlled by one of Singapore's richest families, construction machinery and equipment supplier Tutt Bryant, legally pocketed $5.4 million in JobKeeper payments while it increased its revenue and profits.

Key points:

 

Private and public firms that have profited during the pandemic still got the JobKeeper wage subsidy

There is growing pressure on the federal government to publish the details of all the companies that got JobKeeper and how much they got

On Friday ASIC and the ATO will be grilled in parliamentary hearings on how they handled the JobKeeper payment scheme

 

Tutt Bryant Group is 100 per cent controlled by Singaporean company Tat Hong Holdings, one of the leading names in cranes, heavy lifting and equipment sales across Asia.

 

It is one of thousands of companies that claimed JobKeeper despite their turnover rising during the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

ABC News has obtained Tutt Bryant's latest financial accounts, which indicate that despite revenue being up more than 15 per cent, profit being up by $7.7 million, and dividends of $8.4 million being returned, it received $5.4 million in the JobKeeper payment scheme.

 

The company has been contacted for comment.

 

It was legal under the design of the JobKeeper rules for companies to claim the subsidy and subsequently post an increase in profits.

 

There is no legal obligation to repay the money, but there has been widespread political debate about whether companies that profited have a moral obligation to repay.

 

The company is owned by one of Singapore's wealthiest families, which bought into Tutt Bryant in 1997.

 

Tutt Bryant had listed on Australian stock exchange in December 2005 and delisted in October 2010.

 

On Friday two separate parliamentary hearings will probe regulators over the lack of transparency over the JobKeeper scheme.

 

Parliamentary Budget Office data shared with the ABC showed that $4.6 billion in JobKeeper wage subsidies were sent to firms that saw their revenues rise in the first three months of the program alone.

 

In the construction industry, an estimated $828 million was sent to firms with rising revenues, while in the retail industry, an estimated $460 million was sent to firms with rising turnover.

Construction firm never had a COVID-led downturn

 

Tutt Bryant Group recorded a statutory profit of $13.4 million for the financial year ended March 31, 2021, compared to a loss of $1.35 million in the prior corresponding period.

 

This was mainly due to the group recording a 15.5 per cent increase in consolidated revenue to $287 million ($248.3 million in FY20).

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-10/jobkeeper-private-companies-transparency-turnover-covid-pandemic/100448116