Anonymous ID: 7a64bb Sept. 9, 2021, 6:59 p.m. No.14550464   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Cyberlaw Casebooks

• Patricia L. Bellia et al., Cyberlaw: Problems of Policy and Jurisprudence in the Information Age (3d

ed. 2006)

• Raymond S.R. Ku & Jacqueline D. Lipton, Cyberspace Law: Cases and Materials (2d ed. 2006)

• Mark A. Lemley et al., Software and Internet Law (3d ed. 2006)

• Peter B. Maggs et al., Internet and Computer Law: CasesComments Questions (2d ed. 2005)

• Ronald J. Mann & Jane K. Winn, Electronic Commerce (2d ed. 2004)

• Margaret Jane Radin et al., Internet Commerce: The Emerging Legal Framework (2d ed. 2006)

• Margaret Jane Radin et al., Intellectual Property and the Internet: Cases and Materials (2004)

• Madeleine Schachter, Law of Internet Speech (2d ed. 2002)

• Richard Warner et al., E-Commerce, The Internet and the Law, Cases and Materials (2006)

• Jonathan L. Zittrain, Internet Law (forthcoming 2008)

• Jonathan L. Zittrain, Internet Law Jurisdiction (2005)

• Jonathan L. Zittrain, Internet Law Technological Complements to Copyright (2005)

Computer Crime Casebooks

• Orin S. Kerr, Computer Crime Law (2006)

• David J. Loundy, Computer Crime, Information Warfare & Economic Espionage (2003)

*763 Some Widely Read Cyberlaw-Related Books [FN46]

• Orson Scott Card, Ender's Game (1985)

• William Gibson, Neuromancer (1984)

• Lawrence Lessig, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (1999)

• Bruce Sterling, The Hacker Crackdown: Law and Disorder on the Electronic Frontier (1992)

• Clifford Stoll, The Cuckoo's Egg: Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage (1989)

Some Cyberlaw History

• Edward A. Cavazos & Gavino Morin, Cyberspace and the Law: Your Rights and Duties in the OnLine World (1994)

• Mike Godwin, Cyber Rights: Defending Free Speech in the Digital Age (1998)

• Lance Rose, Netlaw: Your Rights in the Online World (1995)

• Lance Rose & Jonathan Wallace, SysLaw (2d ed. 1992)

 

Intel Corp v. Hamidi, 71 P.3d 296 (Cal. 2003).

>https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6577129237468043105&q=intel+corp+v.+hamidi,+71+P.3d

 

Specht v. Netscape Commc'ns Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002)

>https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9587085159184835436&q=specht+v.+netscape+commc%27ns+corp

 

The common law adapts to human endeavor. For example, if rules developed through judicial decisions for railroads prove nonsensical for automobiles, courts have the ability and duty to change them. (See generally, Keller, Condemned to Repeat the Past: The Reemergence of Misappropriation and other Common Law Theories of Protection for Intellectual Property (1998) 11 Harv.J.L. & Tech. 401, 403-406, 423-26.)