Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 7:57 p.m. No.14550837   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0858 >>0861 >>0871 >>0882 >>0922 >>0961 >>1022 >>1181 >>1212 >>1227

>>14550810

>https://conventionofstates.com

 

OK i found some of what i remember from my research..

 

The notion put forward by groups in favor of an Article V Convention of the States, from both the left and right, that a such a Convention can be limited to a single or limited topics is naïve, uninformed or just plain dishonest. The Constitution is silent on details on how a constitutional convention would be convened or conducted. There are no rules for choosing the leaders. There are also no rules of conduct or checks on what proposals can be considered by the convention.

 

https://www.civilbeat.org/2019/04/reject-dangerous-national-constitutional-convention/

 

but this isnt the main woman i remember which had some very good insight. she had a funny name, and i really believed what she was saying..

 

im still digging

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:03 p.m. No.14550882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0922 >>1022 >>1181 >>1212 >>1227

>>14550837

>>14550810

 

moar

 

Socialists and Soros Fight for Article V Convention

https://thenewamerican.com/socialists-and-soros-fight-for-article-v-convention/

from the top comments:

 

An Article V convention IS a constitutional convention.

 

Those who are pushing for an Article V convention, or a Convention of States, who refuse to call it a Constitutional Convention are either being intentionally deceptive, or are themselves deceived.

 

According to Black's Law Dictionary, a constitutional convention is:

 

"A duly constituted assembly of delegates or representatives of the people of a state or nation for the purpose of framing, revising, OR amending its constitution." (emphasis added)

 

A convention for any of those purposes is legally defined as a constitutional convention.

 

Those pushing for a convention today are trying to change this definition, in order to separate today's movement from the stigma of the thoroughly defeated and discredited constitutional convention movement of the '70s and '80s.

 

Be not deceived. What they were pushing for then under the name of a constitutional convention, and what they are pushing for now under any name but a constitutional convention, is really the same thing! A convention for "framing, revising, or amending its constitution."

 

https://thenewamerican.com/socialists-and-soros-fight-for-article-v-convention/

 

https://oathkeepers.org/2015/04/why-the-article-v-convention-must-be-opposed/

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:10 p.m. No.14550922   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0941 >>1022 >>1181 >>1212 >>1227

>>14550882

>>14550837

 

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

 

This woman is VERY VERY INTELLIGENT.. and she has all the details we need!

 

http://www.indefenseofliberty.tv/dangers-of-the-article-v-convention-of-states/

 

Guest Speaker Publius Huldah, a retired attorney and renowned lecturer on the Constitution, will give a discourse on the “Dangers of the Article V Convention of States and Understanding the Facts.” Her documented information will provide attendees with an insight on how the States and citizens can peacefully restore Federalism, the Rule of Law and the individual rights of American citizens. Included are the concerns of calling for an Article V Convention and the multiple reasons it is not advisable to do so at this time.

 

maybe this would be different but Publius Huldah is someone i would want to have answer that directly!

 

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

 

o7

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:13 p.m. No.14550941   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0960 >>1022 >>1181 >>1212 >>1227

>>14550922

 

https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

 

She is already writing about it all!!!

 

https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

 

Defeat “COVID” Mandates by restoring the Genuine Meaning of the “privileges and immunities” and “due process” clauses

 

By Publius Huldah

 

Our Constitution of 1787 is a glorious Document. But we didn’t read it, we didn’t adhere to its genuine meaning, and we permitted judges to redefine its terms. We must put a stop to that. The following draft 1 Resolution for State and local governments shows how, by restoring the genuine meanings of the “privileges and immunities” and “due process” clauses, we can defeat “COVID” tyranny.

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:24 p.m. No.14551022   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1041 >>1086 >>1212 >>1227

>>14550882

>>14550837

>>14550922

>>14550941

 

RE: Article 5 of Constitution - Convention of States

 

listen to her yourself… she HAS the information we need to address this type of HIDDEN ATTACK.

 

Article V convention: a globalist coup to impose a new Constitution

 

https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2021/06/02/an-article-v-convention-a-globalist-coup-to-impose-a-new-constitution/

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:27 p.m. No.14551041   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14551022

 

Joanna Martin, J.D. (“Publius Huldah”) warns of what’s really behind the push for an Article V convention: to move us into the New World Order or impose a Communist dictatorship.

 

Presented to the Buncombe County Republican Party in Asheville, North Carolina on May 25, 2021.

 

Here are the flyers referred to in the presentation:

 

https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/chart-showing-federal-structure-with-meme-april-2019.pdf

 

https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/how-to-get-a-new-constitution-under-the-pretext-of-proposing-amendments.pdf

 

https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/what-the-convention-lobby-isnt-telling-you-about-our-declaration-of-independence-sep.-2020.pdf

 

https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/crs-report-and-constitution-contradict-coss-false-and-reckless-assurances.pdf

 

https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/brilliant-men-ben-franklin-v.-meckler-ap.-18-2021.pdf

 

https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/nightmare-amendments-from-cos-north-carolina-may-2021.pdf

 

https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/nullification-the-original-right-of-self-defense.pdf

 

For the Exhibits – original source documents – go here: https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/exhibits-to-south-carolina-house-special-committee-on-a5c-feb-13-2020.pdf

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:33 p.m. No.14551086   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14551022

>>14551022

>>14551022

 

To claim these problems can be fixed by AMENDING our Constitution; Makes as much sense as saying Since People Violate the 10 Commandments, GOD should AMEND the 10

Commandments! –Joanna Martin, J.D. (“Publius Huldah”)

 

seriously anons these evil beings are DESPERATE and they will use ANY MEANS NECESSARY including tricking us into DESTROYING our GREAT CONSTITUTION!

 

LISTEN TO EDUCATED AND KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE LIKE THIS WOMAN!

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:44 p.m. No.14551140   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1152 >>1212 >>1227

Re: Article V convention: a globalist coup to impose a new Constitution

 

I find it VERY telling that once i dug up PUBLIS HULDAH every shill shrunk back to the hole they hide in.

 

SHE EVEN KNOWS THE POWER OF THE MEME!!!

 

https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:51 p.m. No.14551181   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1208

>>14550882

>>14550837

>>14550922

>>14550941

 

>>14551152

that does NOTHING to discredit her KNOWLEDGE and INFORMATION.

 

She is the most knowledgeable individual i have ever listened to re: Article V convention, your dislike of the HOST has nothing to hold against her profound intellect.

 

Article V convention: a globalist coup to impose a new Constitution

 

https://youtu.be/C7eGKN2nfRs

 

GO WATCH IT AND LEARN

 

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

Anonymous ID: 364318 Sept. 9, 2021, 8:57 p.m. No.14551218   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>14551197

 

Brilliant Men Warn Against an Article V Convention

Contact Joanna Martin, J.D. at publiushuldah@gmail.com 041821

During April 1788, our 1st US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay wrote that another convention would

run an “extravagant risque.”

In Federalist No. 49, James Madison said a

convention is neither proper nor effective to

restrain government when it encroaches.

In his Nov. 2, 1788 letter to Turberville,

Madison said he “trembled” at the prospect

of a 2nd convention; and if there were an

Article V convention: “the most violent

partizans”, and “individuals of insidious

views” would strive to be delegates and would have “a dangerous opportunity of sapping the very

foundations of the fabric” of our Country.

In Federalist No. 85 (last para.), Hamilton said he “dreads” the consequences of another convention

because the enemies of the Constitution want to get rid of it.

Justice Arthur Goldberg said in his 1986 editorial in the Miami Herald that “it cannot be denied that" the

Philadelphia convention of 1787 "broke every restraint intended to limit its power and agenda,” and “any

attempt at limiting the agenda [at an Article V convention] would almost certainly be unenforceable.”

Chief Justice Warren Burger said in his June 1988 letter to Phyllis Schlafly: “…there is no effective way

to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention… After a Convention is convened, it will be

too late to stop the Convention if we don’t like its agenda… A new Convention could plunge our Nation

into constitutional confusion and confrontation at every turn…”

Justice Scalia said on April 17, 2014 at the 1:06 mark of this video: "I certainly would not want a

Constitutional Convention. I mean whoa. Who knows what would come out of that?"

Eminent constitutional litigators, William Olson & Herb Titus, warn here that the assurances of the

“convention of states” organization are “false and reckless in the extreme.” Other jurists and scholars

have said the same: see Compendium here.

Yet convention supporters ridicule these warnings as “fear mongering.” And they quote law professor

Scalia in 1979, before his decades of experience as a Supreme Court Justice, to “prove” otherwise.

Ask yourself, "Is it possible that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Chief Justice Jay, Justice Goldberg,

Chief Justice Burger, Justice Scalia, and the other eminent lawyers & jurists understand something about the

plenipotentiary powers of Delegates to an Article V convention which the pro-convention lobby and

sponsors haven’t yet grasped?”

 

taken directly from https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/brilliant-men-ben-franklin-v.-meckler-ap.-18-2021.pdf

 

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

Publius Huldah

 

https://youtu.be/C7eGKN2nfRs