Anonymous ID: 5b275f Sept. 10, 2021, 2:35 p.m. No.14554654   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4664 >>4669 >>4679

Lin Wood

 

I am told that below is the current list of Governors who quickly jumped out to say they would oppose the mandatory jabs.

 

Sure makes for good publicity for them which Patriots love to hear.

 

Kinda makes you think they are on our side, doesn’t it?

 

Now go down the list and identify which of these governors are demanding full forensic audits and canvassing of the 2020 vote in their respective states or nationwide.

 

The enemy is the deceiver of deceivers.

 

Don’t let the enemy fool you with a planned distraction from 2020.

 

18:25

 

Lin Wood

 

Kristi Noem - South Dakota

Brian Kemp - Georgia

Kevin Stitt - Oklahoma

Greg Abbott - Texas

Key Ivey - Alabama

Mark Gordon - Wyoming

Bill Lee - Tennessee

Henry McMaster - South Carolina

Pete Ricketts - Nebraska

Brad Little - Idaho

Kim Reynolds - Iowa

Mike Parson - Missouri

Doug Ducey - Arizona

Tate Reeves - Mississippi

Ron DeSantis - Florida

Greg Gianforte - Montana

Anonymous ID: 5b275f Sept. 10, 2021, 3:39 p.m. No.14555055   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Monoclonal Antibodies good option in pregnany due to neutralization?

Great…

If so use it for that….

Why the need to have so many people getting PEP?

 

Last updated August 30, 2021 at 9:32 a.m. EST

 

Various monoclonal antibody treatments are available only under emergency use authorization (EUA). They are recommended for the treatment of outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 infection who are at high risk of clinical progression as defined by the EUA criteria. Pregnancy is included among the conditions that put individuals at high risk for clinical progression. This makes patients with pregnancy as their only risk factor eligible to receive outpatient monoclonal antibodies, according to the EUA (NIH). Obstetric care clinicians may consider the use of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of non-hospitalized COVID-19 positive pregnant individuals with mild to moderate symptoms, particularly if one or more additional risk factors are present (eg BMI >25, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease).

 

Post-exposure prophylaxis should be considered for inadequately vaccinated individuals who have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (NIH). These individuals include those who have had a recent exposure to an individual with SARS-CoV-2 for a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period or there is a recent occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in other individuals in the same institutional setting AND are 1) not fully vaccinated or 2) fully vaccinated but may not mount an adequate immune response.

 

The CDC currently recommends waiting 90 days to get the vaccine after receipt of monoclonal antibodies (CDC).

 

Efforts should be made to ensure that communities most affected by SARS-CoV-2 have equitable access to these treatments. Future data will likely inform optimal use of this therapeutic option by pregnant patients.

Anonymous ID: 5b275f Sept. 10, 2021, 3:50 p.m. No.14555137   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Block it from getting to those places, great!

Use it in people who really have the need.

I guarantee it's being used in patients who would be completely fine wihtout it.

Do as you please.

No one cares anymore.

Anonymous ID: 5b275f Sept. 10, 2021, 4:02 p.m. No.14555193   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Alternative prophylaxis and treatment exists for many considered high risk in EUA group.

Although tiral showed promise for mAB's PEP.

Give it to the ones who really need it.

Even with asthma, say you were categorized as moderate persistent but are very well controlled… you are still pushing it with PEP and alternatives exist. Asymptomatic infections are a thing.

Pregnany, risk vs benefit very important.