“If Jewels Are Stolen from Tiffany’s They Need to Be Returned” – President Trump Drops BREAKING BOMBSHELL with The Gateway Pundit on 2020 Election

President Trump dropped some major bombs during his discussion this evening with the Gateway Pundit.

The Storm Has Arrived 17 on Telegram shared the following about the Gateway Pundit’s discussion with President Trump this evening:

President Trump was asked about what happens if the states conducting audits decertify their elections.

“When you rob the store if it’s diamonds…and you get caught, you’re supposed to return them…

…and then you’re gonna have to say ‘well okay, we caught them cheating’. You’re gonna let somebody that cheated stay for 3 more years? I can’t imagine it.”

President shared the following during his interview with The Gateway Pundit:

https://rumble.com/vmc99b-huge-trump-anticipates-election-to-be-decertified-during-gateway-pundit-int.html

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/jewels-stolen-tiffanys-need-returned-president-trump-drops-breaking-bombshell-gateway-pundit-2020-election/

Facebook Pairs With Ray-Ban To Launch Smart Glasses, Sparking Privacy Concerns

Facebook has teamed up with Ray-Ban to launch a pair of smart glasses that the social media giant says are “designed with privacy in mind,” though the product is already sparking privacy concerns.

The glasses, which were created in partnership with Ray-Ban maker EssilorLuxottica, allow wearers to listen to music, take calls, or capture photos and short videos and share them across Facebook’s services using a companion app, the company announced in a Sept. 10 release.

Facebook insists that the spectacles, called “Ray-Ban Stories,” were designed with privacy in mind.

“As with any new device, we have a big responsibility to help people feel comfortable and provide peace of mind, and that goes not only for device owners but the people around them, too. That’s why we baked privacy directly into the product design and functionality of the full experience, from the start,” the company said in the release, which features a video of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg discussing some of the product’s features.

Zuckerberg touted hardware protections like a power switch to turn off the mic and camera, along with a light meant to alert people that the glasses are in capture mode.

“We put this LED light on the front of the glasses so that people around you will know when you’re taking a photo or video,” Zuckerberg said in the recording. “It lights up to let people know that the camera is on.”

Facebook and Ray-Ban’s first smart glasses which launched on Sept. 9, 2021. (Ray-Ban and Facebook/Handout via Reuters)

In remarks to Axios, Jeremy Greenberg, privacy counsel for the Future of Privacy Forum, praised the idea of an indicator like the LED light but noted it was hard to spot from a distance or by people with low vision.

“Hopefully we don’t have folks using these for stalking,” Greenberg told the outlet.

Zuckerberg insisted in the presentation video that when the glasses are turned off, “they are completely off.”

“The mic is off and you can’t take photos or record videos,” the Facebook chief added.

Facebook told The Wall Street Journal that it had reached out to privacy groups and experts like the National Consumers League regarding the product’s design. John Breyault, vice president for the National Consumers League, said his organization recommended an automatic disable function for the camera when the light was covered, or modifying the design to distinguish them from regular Ray-Bans to make it easier for people who don’t want to be recorded to spot them and raise objections.

“Unfortunately, those features weren’t included in this first iteration of these smart glasses,” Breyault told the outlet.

Facebook, which reported revenue of about $86 billion in 2020, makes most of its money from advertising but has invested heavily in virtual and augmented reality, developing hardware such as its Oculus VR headsets and working on wristband technologies to support augmented reality glasses.

Major tech firms including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Snap have raced to develop various smart glasses products, but early offerings like Google Glass proved difficult to sell to consumers put off by high price points and design issues.

Facebook, which has in the past faced criticism over its handling of user data, said it would not access the media used by its smart-glasses customers without their consent.

The company also said it would not use the content of the photos or videos captured using the glasses and stored in the Facebook View app for personalizing ads, and said the glasses would be an “ads-free experience.”

Facebook has also launched a privacy-focused micro-site where it offers guidelines for responsible use of the smart glasses.

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/facebook-pairs-ray-ban-launch-smart-glasses-sparking-privacy-concerns

‘We Need to Protect Kids from Parents’: House Democrats Rail Against Schools Requiring Parental Consent to Vaccinate Children

Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY) said the government knows better than parents when it comes to vaccinating children against the Chinese coronavirus.

During a budget reconciliation markup meeting on Thursday, Yarmuth slammed an amendment sponsored by Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL) that proposes that schools must obtain parent or guardian consent before vaccinating children.

He said in opposition to the amendment:

I know I’ll get in a lot of trouble for this, but I want to refer to the sponsor’s premise for the amendment, and the first words out of her mouth were, ‘parents know what’s best for their children.’ I think the evidence is compelling and overwhelming and widespread that they don’t.

The congressman, who is also chairman of the Budget Committee, further emphasized that he believes “a lot of parents are misinformed” which is “why we have, literally, tens of thousands of kids now in hospitals and suffering from this virus.”

“One of the reasons that we need to avoid steps like this is that we need to protect kids from their parents,” he said. [emphasis added] “That is the unfortunate state of the country right now. And for that reason and many others, I will oppose the amendment.”

When introducing her amendment for discussion, Miller said her proposal is squarely focused on the acquisition of parental consent prior to the provision of medical care to minors, and contended that “parents know what’s best for their children — not any governing body.”

Breitbart News obtained the amendment on Friday, which would reportedly bolster “parental consent protections.” It reads:

A local educational agency that receives funding under this part may not offer vaccinations to minors on property owned or managed by such local educational agency without the consent of a parent or guardian.

Squad member Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) went as far as calling the proposal “nonsensical” and railed against people who refuse to follow “the science” of masks and vaccines.

“I believe we have to protect our children, and I think this amendment is nonsensical. It doesn’t go with the science. It doesn’t make any sense, and it is not protecting our children,” Jayapal said.

Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA) argued that Miller was creating a “straw man argument,” and that the problem needs no addressing because it is nonexistent.

“This is a nonsense amendment that is in search of a problem that does not exist,” Takano said.

Contrary to his disbelief, minors in at least 16 states can consent in certain situations to general medical care, according to a report from News Nation. Some states, including Alabama, Oregon and South Carolina, “give teenagers authority to consent to all health care decisions on their own,” National Public Radio reported.

“Others, including California and New York, allow children 12 and older to consent to vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases,” the report states.

Both Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) and Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) expressed disgust toward Democrat statements about Miller’s amendment. Wilson said:

I was actually appalled at the statement from Kentucky that we have to protect kids from parents. That’s outrageous. I want to thank the author because she exposed the view which is absolutely inconceivable to me that the government knows better than parents.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/09/10/we-need-to-protect-kids-from-parents-house-democrats-rail-against-schools-requiring-parental-consent-to-vaccinate-children/