Anonymous ID: e0e785 Sept. 10, 2021, 8:18 p.m. No.14556696   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6718 >>6724 >>6738

>>14556679

Blockchain isn't about currency. In fact it's one of the worst uses for it. Did you know West Virginia uses a blockchain based system in their elections? The USPS is also building a blockchain voting system that secures the ID factors that make mail in voting insecure.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/vipinbharathan/2020/09/20/us-postal-service-files-a-patent-for–voting-system-combining-mail-and-a-blockchain/

Anonymous ID: e0e785 Sept. 10, 2021, 8:26 p.m. No.14556738   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>14556696

Actually scratch that WV, apparently it was ditched after the midterms in 2018. Obviously still didn't quite get it right. Same point still applies though, don't kneejerk crypto into cabal cashless society right out of the gate, you're robbing yourself some interesting knowledge.

 

The bottom line is this. You will never get America back to computer less elections, it's not going to happen. You also cannot stop the push to make voting easier, thus mail ins. So you need to make it secure, period. Proper vetting of ID/voting status and proper logging and counting of the ballots. If I can prove my identity and create full service financial accounts online with a cell phone than I'm pretty sure we can figure out how to conduct a proper, secure election in similar fashion for those who wish to use it. Ironically one of the most fundamental concepts of blockchain is an immutable ledger. When's the last time you could truly verify that your in person paper ballot actually went into the tally?